green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Persico
See Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229-230 , 74 S.Ct. 450 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954); United States v. McKinney, 429 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 910 , 27 L.Ed.2d 825 ; Richardson v. United States, 360 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1966); Ryan v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 191 F.2d 779, 781 (1951), cert. denied sub nom., Duncan v. United States, 342 U.S. 928 , 72 S.Ct. 368 , 96 L.Ed. 691 (1952); but see United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 924 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 984 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Wheaton
e have repeatedly held that the granting or refusing to grant rests within the sound discretion of the district court and its action must stand in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion
discussed
Cited "see"
Pashaian v. Eccelston Properties, Ltd.
See United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856, 861 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 924 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 984 (1968); cf. United States v. Sciarra, 851 F.2d 621, 636 (3d Cir.1988) (denying nonparty witnesses standing to challenge failure to recuse in context of order to compel their depositions).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pashaian v. Eccelston Properties, Ltd.
See United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856, 861 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 924 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 984 (1968); cf. United States v. Sciarra, 851 F.2d 621, 636 (3d Cir.1988) (denying nonparty witnesses standing to challenge failure to recuse in context of order to compel their depositions).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc., Dated August 13, 1975
See United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
See United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968); United States v. Pittsburgh Nat’l Bank, 388 F.Supp. 963 (W.D.Pa.1975); United States v. Northwest Pa. Bank & Trust Co., 355 F.Supp. 607 (W.D.Pa.1973); United States v. First National Bank of Fort Smith, Ark., 173 F.Supp. 716 (W.D.Ark.1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Carl Rosen, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Alvin I. Malnik
First National Bank of Mobile v. United States, 160 F.2d 532, 535 (5th Cir., 1947) ; see United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129, 131 (3rd Cir., 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. R. Marbury Stamp, United States of America v. Harlan E. Freeman, United States of America v. E. Neil Rogers, United States of America v. Walter R. Reynolds
See Spinney v. United States, 385 F.2d 908 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968); Frohmann v. United States, 380 F.2d 832 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 976 , 88 S.Ct. 478 , 19 L.Ed.2d 469 (1967); Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 236 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967); United States v. Maius, 378 F.2d 716 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 216 , 19 L.Ed.2d 219 (1967); United States v. Mancuso, 378 F.2d 612 , modified, 387 F.2d 376 (4th Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 955 , 88 S.Ct. 1051…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stamp
See Spinney v. United States, 385 F.2d 908 (1st Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968); Frohmann v. United States, 380 F.2d 832 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 976 , 88 S.Ct. 478 , 19 L.Ed.2d 469 (1967); Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 236 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967); United States v. Maius, 378 F.2d 716 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 216 , 19 L.Ed.2d 219 (1967); United States v. Mancuso, 378 F.2d 612 , modified, 387 F.2d 376 (4th Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 955 , 88 S.Ct. 1051…
cited
Cited "see"
J. C. White v. United States of America, Leo Kubik v. United States
Accord, Spinney v. United States, 385 F.2d 908, 910 (1st Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
See, e. g., United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129, 130 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Friedman
See, e. g., United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129, 131 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America and William L. Beerman, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Paul Friedman, Appeal of Morris Kirshenbaum and Joy Kirshenbaum, Intervenors in District Court. United States of America and William L. Beerman, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Pittsburgh National Bank, and Morris Kirshenbaum and Joy Kirshenbaum, Intervenors in D. C. United States of America and William L. Beerman, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Ivy School of Professional Art, Inc. And Morris B. Kirshenbaum, as President of Ivy School of Professional Art, Inc. Appeal of Morris Kirshenbaum and Joy Kirshenbaum, Intervenors in D. C., and Ivy School of Professional Art, Inc., and Morris B. Kirshenbaum, as President of Ivy School of Professional Art, Inc. United States of America and William L. Beerman, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Pittsburgh National Bank, Morris Kirshenbaum and Joy Kirshenbaum, Intervenors in D. C
See, e. g., United States v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129, 131 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 (1968) 17 Appendix at 373A, 379A (testimony of Walter J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
See also United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856, 860 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 924 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 984 (1968); In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 385 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 ; United States v. Hanrahan, 248 F.Supp. 471, 478 (D.D.C.1965). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
See also United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856, 860 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 924 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 984 (1968); In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 385 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 ; United States v. Hanrahan, 248 F.Supp. 471, 478 (D.D.C. 1965). [38] In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 385 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America and Albert J. Valentas, Internal Revenue Agent v. Humble Oil & Refining Company
See also United States v. Dauphin Trust Co., 385 F.2d 129 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 D.Ed. 2d 981 (1968) (treating expansiveness of summons as an issue distinct from Powell limitations).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Young-Peterson Construction, Inc.
v.
Potomac Insurance Co. of the District of Columbia
v.
Potomac Insurance Co. of the District of Columbia
No. 907.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 29, 1968.
John P. Madigan for petitioner. John C. Bartler for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.