Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
226 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 50 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Garcia (nyappdiv, 1991-07-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Garcia
N.Y. App. Div. · 1991 · confidence medium
Clearly, "[i]f the plea were testimonial or evidentiary, the court would have no power to demand it.” (Wood v United States, supra, at 274.) While the People do not contend that a prior plea of not guilty which is later contradicted by a guilty plea is always admissible to impeach a defendant who testifies, they argue that in this case defendant’s direct testimony opened the door to such inquiry on cross-examination (see People v Melendez, 55 NY2d 445 ).
examined Cited as authority (rule) United States v. One Philco Television (3×) also: Cited "see"
S.D. Tex. · 1968 · confidence medium
The following language by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit well states this Court’s opinion and judgment on this point: “Marehetti holds that compliance with §§ 4411 and 4412 subjects the taxpayer to ‘real and appreciable,’ and not merely ‘imaginary and unsubstantial,’ hazards of self-incrimination. (390 U.S. at p. 48, 88 S.Ct. at p. 702).
cited Cited "see" State v. Alexander
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Conti, 361 F. 2d 153, 157 (2 Cir.1966), vacated on other grounds 390 U.S. 204 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 1035 (1968).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Leo Crutchfield (3×)
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Driscoll v. United States, 356 F.2d 324, 327 (1st Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968). *501 In Stevenson v. United States, supra, the issue was whether the defendant in a federal prosecution for murder on an Indian reservation was entitled to an instruction on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wilson Ramirez
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153, 158 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Cioffi, slip op. 4845, 4854 (2d Cir. July 16, 1973). 55 Nor is there any merit in Gomez' claims that there were variances between the indictment and proof, or a failure of proof, in that (a) the conspiracy proven was not of as long duration as that charged in Count One, although it fell within the period charged, United States v. Postma, 242 F.2d 488, 496-497 (2d Cir.) (on petition for rehearing), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 922 , 77 S.Ct. 13…
examined Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Hurley v. State of Delaware (3×)
D. Del. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Serao, 367 F.2d 347 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1967) and United States v. Nolan, 413 F.2d 850 (6th Cir. 1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ramirez
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153, 158 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Cioffi, slip op. 4845, 4854 (2d Cir. July 16, 1973).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Paul Anthony Coppola (3×)
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Grassia, 354 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1965), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968). 2 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pagán
D.P.R. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also U. S. v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153 (2nd Cir.) (1966) Vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968) ; U. S. ex rel.
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr. (6×)
7th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Driscoll v. United States, 1 Cir., 356 F.2d 324, 331 , vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202 , 88 S.Ct. 899 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 ; United States v. Warner, 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 730, 735 , cert. denied 400 U.S. 930 , 91 S.Ct. 194 , 27 L.Ed.2d 191 ; Greenbaum v. United States, 9 Cir., 80 F.2d 113, 116 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PICCIOLI
v.
UNITED STATES.
4.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1968.
390 U.S. 202
Per Curiam.
Cited by 54 opinions  |  Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Alfred Belinkie for petitioner in No. 4. Edward G. Burstein for petitioner in No. 5. David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for petitioner in No. 6. Francis J. DiMento, Paul J. Burns and Ronald R. Popeo for petitioners in No. 10. Albert J. Krieger and Robert Kasanof for petitioners in No. 32. Max M. Barr for petitioner in No. 374.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 4 and No. 2, Misc. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in Nos. 5, 6 and 10. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Miss Rosenberg for the United States in No. 32. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States in No. 374.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated, and the cases[*203] are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

[*] Together with No. 5, Millo v. United States; No. 6, Grassia v. United States; No. 10, Driscoll et al. v. United States; No. 32, Serao et al. v. United States; No. 374, Wrieole v. United States; and No. 2, Misc., Gjanci v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. Nos. 5, 6, 32, and 2, Misc., are to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 374 to the Third Circuit, and No. 10 to the First Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 2, Misc., is also granted.