green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Donoghue v. Natural Microsystems Corp.
See Roth v. Fund of Funds, Ltd., 405 F.2d 421 , 422-23 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 975 , 89 S.Ct. 1469 , 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969); see also Texas Int’l Airlines v. Nat’l Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533, 536 (5th Cir.1983) (“The case law uniformly rejects equitable defenses in section 16(b) cases.”) (citing Roth, 405 F.2d at 422-23; Magida v. Cont’l Can Co., 231 F.2d 843 , 846 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 972 , 76 S.Ct. 1031 , 100 L.Ed. 1490 (1956); Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1, 8 (S.D.N.Y. 1980); Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Leeds & Northrup Co., 4…
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,815 Itoba Limited v. Lep Group Plc, William R. Berkley, John L. Read, Peter J. Grant, John R. East
See Roth v. Fund of Funds, Ltd., 279 F.Supp. 935, 936-37 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 405 F.2d 421 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 975 , 89 S.Ct. 1469 , 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,488 Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Roth v. Fund of Funds, Ltd., 405 F.2d 421 , 422-23 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 975 , 89 S.Ct. 1469 , 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969); Magida v. Continental Can Co., 231 F.2d 843, 846 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 972 , 76 S.Ct. 1031 , 100 L.Ed. 1490 (1956); Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1, 8 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Leeds & Northrup Co., 469 F.Supp. 1021, 1023 (E.D.Wis.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.
See, e.g., Roth v. Fund of Funds, Ltd., 405 F.2d 421 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 975 , 89 S.Ct. 1469 , 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969), rehearing denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1994 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); In the Matter of I.O.S., Ltd.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States for the Use and Benefit of Trane Co.
v.
Gelman, dba Gelco Builders
v.
Gelman, dba Gelco Builders
No. 1119.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1969.
Herman N. Schwartz for petitioner., Jack Hart for respondents.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.