green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969)(when court improperly proposes to dismiss charges and such action is beyond its power, mandamus will lie).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence D'AllesAnDro v. United States
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 , 198 (2 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); United States v. Weinstein, 452 F.2d 704 , 712—13 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied sub nom., Grunberger v. United States, 406 U.S. 917 , 92 S.Ct. 1766 , 32 L.Ed.2d 116 (1972); United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 , 626—627 (2 Cir. 1975), petition for certiorari filed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvin E. Young, Appeal of Robert Green
Under Rule 12, Fed.R.Crim.P., the defense of former jeopardy may be raised by motion prior to trial since the manifest purpose of the rule is to dispose of such motions, if possible, without the need of a lengthy trial; see Dooling v. United States, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 11 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969), and because the double jeopardy protections are intended to avoid repeated prosecutions for the same offense, as well as repeated punishment.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Seafarers International Union of North America
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); United States v. Pinero, 329 F.Supp. 992, 994 (S.D.N.Y. 1971); cf. United States v. Blaustein, 325 F.Supp. 233, 238 (S.D.N.Y. 1971); United States v. Blanca Perez, 310 F.Supp. 550, 551 (S.D.N.Y. 1970) (prima facie prejudice).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,385 United States of America v. Sidney Stein and Security Underwriting Consultants, Inc.
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 196 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanden
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U. S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); Fleming v. United States, 378 F.2d 502 (1st Cir. 1967). “[Bjefore Rule 48(b) can be invoked there must be a showing that the delay prejudiced the defendant’s ability to rebut the government’s case, or that the delay was caused by oppressive governmental action.” United States v. Dooling, supra, 406 F.2d at page 196.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dallago
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Desmond MacKin by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. United States of America v. Desmond MacKin Desmond MacKin v. George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York
Compare Ex parte United States, 287 U.S. 241 , 53 S.Ct. 129 , 77 L.Ed. 283 (1932) (Supreme Court has power to grant mandamus requiring a district court to issue a bench warrant for the arrest of an indicted defendant since a conviction would be reviewable by a court of appeals and, on certiorari, by the Supreme Court.) 25 We have considered somewhat similar questions in United States v. Dooling, 2nd Cir., 406 F.2d 192, 197 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969) and United States v. Weinstein, 2nd Cir., 452 F.2d 704 , 708-13 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 917 , 92 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mackin
Compare Ex parte United States, 287 U.S. 241 , 53 S.Ct. 129 , 77 L.Ed. 283 (1932) (Supreme Court has power to grant mandamus requiring a district court to issue a bench warrant for the arrest of an indicted defendant since a conviction would be reviewable by a court of appeals and, on certiorari, by the Supreme Court.) We have considered somewhat similar questions in United States v. Dooling, 2nd Cir., 406 F.2d 192, 197, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969) and United States v. Weinstein, 2nd Cir., 452 F.2d 704, 708-13 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 917 , 92 S.Ct.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Acosta
See, e. g., United States v. Dooling, 2 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 192 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel MacKlin
Compare United States v. DiStefano, 464 F.2d 845 (2 Cir. 1972), with United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 198-99 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Bernard Singleton
(2×)
Furthermore, the Government was prepared to go to trial in April, 1971, when Morris was able to testify, but the trial was postponed at the defendant's request, see United States v. Persico, 425 F.2d 1375, 1385 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 869 , 91 S.Ct. 102 , 27 L.Ed.2d 108 (1970). 14 Because the primary purpose of Rule 48(b) is to enforce the right to a speedy trial, Pollard, supra, 352 U.S. at 361 n. 7, 77 S.Ct. 481 ; see also, United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 196 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969), no special at…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berger
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 1190.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1969.
Richard L. Levy and Solomon Fisher for petitioners., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Crombie J. D. Garrett for respondent.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.