green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"predatory intent"
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'n
predatory intent
discussed
Cited "see"
Chamin Sarin v. Samaritan Health Center
See Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 815-16 (6th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., Pennington v. United Mine Workers, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968) (citing United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 , 86 S.Ct. 1130 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1965)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sarin v. Samaritan Health Center
See Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 815-16 (6th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., Pennington v. United Mine Workers, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968) (citing United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 , 86 S.Ct. 1130 , 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1965)).
discussed
Cited "see"
White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
See Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806 (6th Cir.1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968), reh’g denied 393 U.S. 1045 , 89 S.Ct. 616 , 21 L.Ed.2d 599 (1969); United States Plywood Corp. v. General Plywood Corp., 370 F.2d 500 (6th Cir.1966), cert. denied 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 42 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967); Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Welch, 269 F.2d 142 (6th Cir.1959); National Transformer Corp. v. France Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Honeywell, Inc. v. Diamond
See Fredkin v. Irasek, 397 F.2d 342 , 348 — 49 (C.C.P.A.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 980 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 441 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dinneen
See Lewis v. Pennington, 6 Cir., 400 F.2d 806, 819 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Nissan Antitrust Litigation. P. D. Q., Inc. Of Miami v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U. S. A. And Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.
See Lewis v. Pennington, 6 Cir., 400 F.2d 806, 819 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Re/Max International v. Realty One, Inc.
See also Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 811 (6th Cir.) (“a specific intent to accomplish an unlawful result is necessary where monopoly power has not been obtained and the charge is an attempt or conspiracy to monopolize”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968). 13 Proof of specific intent to monopolize “may be shown by direct evidence or inferred from anticompetitive acts.” Richter Concrete Corp. v. Hilltop Concrete Corp., 691 F.2d 818, 826 (6th Cir.1982) (applying the same specific intent requirement for claims of attempted monopolization to claims of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adkins v. Gaf Corporation
See, e.g., Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 816-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968); Anthan v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers, 672 F.2d 706, 711-12 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adkins v. GAF Corp.
See, e.g., Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 816-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 444 (1968); Anthan v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers, 672 F.2d 706, 711-12 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hazeltine Corp. v. United States
See, e.g., Fredkin v. Irasek, 55 CCPA 1302, 397 F.2d 342, 347 , 158 USPQ 280 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 980 , 89 S.Ct. 450 , 21 L.Ed.2d 441 (1968), cited in Correge v. Murphy, 705 F.2d 1326, 1329 , 216 USPQ 753 (Fed.Cir.1983). 22 In this re gard, the court finds that a plurality of elements and a mounting of the same on the columns were essential limitations of the claims.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fredkin
v.
Irasek
v.
Irasek
No. 565.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1968.
Robert H. Riñes, David Riñes, and Nelson H. Shapiro for petitioner., John Hoxie and William T. Estabrook for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. C. P. A. Certi-orari denied.