green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.9 score
“residual" benefit to a company's domestic carriage resulting from subsidization of voyages stopping at both domestic and foreign ports did not result in "unfair competition" with domestic carrier because "the california-hawaii trade will grow enough to accommodate both”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Juanita M. Kreps, Individually and as Secretary of Commerce, American President Lines, Ltd., Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Juanita M. Kreps, Individually and as Secretary of Commerce
residual" benefit to a company's domestic carriage resulting from subsidization of voyages stopping at both domestic and foreign ports did not result in "unfair competition" with domestic carrier because "the california-hawaii trade will grow enough to accommodate both
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Kreps
residual benefit to a company's domestic carriage resulting from subsidization of voyages stopping at both domestic and foreign ports did not result in "unfair competition" with domestic carrier because "the california-hawaii trade will grow enough to accommodate both
discussed
Cited "see"
Moye v. State
See Maxwell v. Bishop, 385 U. S. 650 (87 SC 768, 17 LE2d 671).” Cummings v. State, 226 Ga. 46, 51 , supra. Although the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Maxwell case to consider, inter alia, the single-verdict procedure ( 393 U. S. 997 ), that case has been remanded to the District Court to consider a belatedly-raised Witherspoon issue. 38 U. S. L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aubrey Wharton
See Maxwell v. Bishop, 398 F.2d 138 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. granted, 393 U.S. 997 , 89 S.Ct. 488 , 21 L.Ed.2d 462 (1968), reargument ordered, 395 U.S. 918 , 89 S.Ct. 1768 , 23 L.Ed.2d 236 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. Board of Education
See also, Maxwell v. Bishop, 398 F.2d 138, 141-48 (8th Cir.), cert, granted, 393 U.S. 997 , 89 S.Ct. 488 , 21 L.Ed.2d 462 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Gissel Packing Co., Inc. and Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc.
v.
Gissel Packing Co., Inc. and Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc.
No. 573; No. 691.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1968.
Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for petitioner in No. 573, and Albert Gore for petitioner in No. 691. Lewis P. Hamlin, Jr., for respondent General Steel Products, Inc., in No. 573.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.