green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mississippi Gay Alliance and Anne Debary v. Bill Goudelock
(2×)
But see Gay Lib v. University of Missouri, W.D.Mo.1976, --- F.Supp. ---- (45 L.W. 2021, June 29, 1976) 37 Cf. Markham Advertising Co. v. State, 1968, 73 Wash.2d 405 , 439 P.2d 248 , appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 1969, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 512 (state statute may permit highway billboards to advertise businesses located in the neighborhood but not elsewhere) Even broadly drawn and superficially content-neutral source restrictions may produce unjustifiable content discrimination.
cited
Cited "see"
Daugherty v. Wallace
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 [ 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 ].
cited
Cited "see"
Sturgell v. Creasy
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff’d, 393 U.S. 323 [ 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed. 511 ].
cited
Cited "see"
Sturgell v. Creasy
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 ( 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed. 511 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donnelly Advertising Corp. v. Mayor of Baltimore
(2×)
See Markham Advertising Co. v. State, 73 Wash. 2d 405 , 439 *667 P. 2d 248 (1968), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 393 U. S. 316 , 89 S. Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 512 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Andrews
(2×)
See Markham Advertising Co. v. State, 73 Wash.2d 405 , 439 P.2d 248 (1968), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 512 (1969); State v. Yard Birds, Inc., 9 Wash.App. 514 , 513 P.2d 1030 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick v. Tennessee Department of Public Welfare
See Snell v. Wyman, D.C., 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff’d, 393 U.S. 323 [ 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 ].
discussed
Cited "see"
Paka v. Manson
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853, 865 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969); cf. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 208 , 47 S.Ct. 584 , 71 L.Ed. 1000 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Norton
(2×)
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853, 869 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) (three-judge district court), aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis v. Child
(2×)
See Snell v. Wyman, D.C., 281 F. Supp. 853 , aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 .
cited
Cited "see"
Travis v. Department of Public Welfare
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F. Supp. 853 (1968), affirmed, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S. Ct. 553 , 21 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Fullington v. Shea
See Snell v. Wyman, D.C., 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff’d, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 .
cited
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Rockefeller
Jacobs v. Tawes, 250 F.2d 611 (4th Cir. 1957); See Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.S.upp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d on other grounds, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzales v. Shea
See Snell v. Wyman, D.C., 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff’d, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7
See Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (three judge court) (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d on other grounds 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7
See Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (three judge court) (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd on other grounds 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1968). 25 LUMBARD, Chief Judge (dissenting). 26 I dissent. 27 After lengthy correspondence, two personal interviews, and extensive personal testimonials, Dr. Fein was granted conscientious objector status by his local board.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Swank
(2×)
See Snell v. Wyman, D.C., 281 F.Supp. 853 , aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Catalano v. Department of Hospitals of City of New York
(2×)
See Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853, 867-868 (S.D.N.Y.1968), affd., 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 511 (1969) (holding that New York’s welfare laws and regulations requiring welfare recipients in certain instances to repay the cost of assistance benefits if they are discovered to have property, recover for injuries in a lawsuit or are entitled to insurance proceeds, are not inconsistent with Social Security provisions which grant aid to families with dependent children to enable recipients of assistance “to attain or retain capability for * * * maximum self-support and personal …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Lawrence, Dykes, Goodenberger, Bower & Clancy
See also Arizo na Employers’ Liability Cases, 250 U.S. 400, 419-422 [ 89 S.Ct. 553 , 555-556, 63 L.Ed. 1058 ] (1919).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perillo v. Commonwealth
See also Snell v. Wyman, 281 F.Supp. 853 (D.N.Y.1968), aff'd, 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969), upholding a comparable policy of the State of New York.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oscar Dale Porter v. Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of the United States
(2×)
See also Boyd v. Clark, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert J. Crowley v. Peter P. Pierce, Jr., as State Director of Selective Service
Compare Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 1968, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 , and Breen v. Selective Service Board, 1970, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 , with Clark v. Gabriel, 1968, 393 U.S. 256 , 89 S.Ct. 424 , 21 L.Ed.2d 418 , and Boyd v. Clark (S.D.N.Y. 1968) 287 F.Supp. 561 , aff’d 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis L. McLain v. Selective Service Local Board No. 47, Etc.
See also Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d per curiam at 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969) on the basis of Clark v. Gabriel, supra. This Circuit has on several occasions considered the availability of pre-induction review under the Oestereich exception to Section 10(b) (3).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murray v. Vaughn
See, e. g., Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968), Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817 , 826 and n. 7 (2nd Cir. 1967), Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), judgment affirmed, but jurisdictional amount question expressly left open, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (Jan. 13, 1969), Armendariz v. Hershey, 295 F.Supp. 1351 (W.D.Texas Feb. 5, 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kraus v. Selective Service System Local 25
See also Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd per curiam, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969), which held that § 10(b) (3) barred a pre-induction challenge to the constitutionality of student deferments. 3 In his memorandum submitted to the Court in April 1968, the Solicitor General stated in part: "It is possible to construe [§ 10(b) (3)] as applicable to the generality of situations where the local board has applied its judgment, but to exclude purported action of a board which is in fact contrary to an exemption which has been expressly granted by statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kraus v. Selective Service System Local 25
See also Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), affd per curiam, 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (1969), which held that § 10(b) (3) barred a pre-induction challenge to the constitutionality of student deferments. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FREED
v.
BALDI
v.
BALDI
No. 652.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1969.
George Louis Creamer for appellant.
Cited by 43 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.