green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of Montreal
See Broadview Chemical Corp., v. Loctite Corp., 417 F.2d 998, 1001 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1064 , 90 S.Ct. 1502 , 25 L.Ed.2d 686 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blessings Corporation v. Altman
See Broadview Chemical Corp. v. Loctite Corp., 417 F.2d 998 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 1064 , 90 S.Ct. 1502 , 25 L.Ed.2d 686 (1970) ; Muller v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., supra. See also Wallace & Tiernan, Inc. v. General Electric Co., D.C., 291 F.Supp. 217 ; Components, Inc. v. Western Electric Company, 318 F.Supp. 959 (D.Me.1970) ; Thiokol Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 319 F.Supp. 218 (D.Del.1970), affd. 448 F.2d 1328 (3rd Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1019 , 92 S.Ct. 684 , 30 L.Ed.2d 662 (1972). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tempco Electric Heater Corporation v. Omega Engineering, Inc.
Compare Broadview Chemical Corp. v. Loctite Corp., 417 F.2d 998 , 1000 n. 3 (2d Cir.1969) (appellate court may substitute its judgment), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1064 , 90 S.Ct. 1502 , 25 L.Ed.2d 686 (1970) with Mission Insurance Co. v. Puritan Fashions Corp., 706 F.2d 599 , 601 n. 2 (5th Cir.1983) (suggesting that abuse of discretion standard is more consistent with institutional role of appellate courts and declining to follow International Harvester).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Superior Steel Door & Trim Co. v. Banner Metals Division of Intercole Automation, Inc.
See also, Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite Corporation, 417 F.2d 998, 1000-01 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1064 , 90 S.Ct. 1502 , 25 L.Ed.2d 686 (for guidelines for the exercise of the court’s discretion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berman
v.
Board of Elections of the City of New York
v.
Board of Elections of the City of New York
No. 1316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1970.
J. Lee Rankin, Stanley Buchsbaum, and Robert T. Hartmann for Board of Elections of the City of New York, Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Joel H. Sachs, Assistant Attorney General, for Rockefeller et al., respondents. Sol Rosen for Rabbinical Alliance of America as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Rabbinical Alliance of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.