green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“action,' as used in rule 15(c), means a lawsuit”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Heather Kitchel Leachman, Northern Counties Lumber, Inc. v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, a Delaware Corp.
action,' as used in rule 15(c), means a lawsuit
discussed
Cited "see"
Center for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville
See City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 103 N.J.Super. 41 , 246 A.2d 509 (Law Div.1968), modified, on other grounds 54 N.J. 171 , 254 A.2d 513 , cert. denied sub nom., City of Newark v. Port of New York Authority, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-Party
See Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969). 8 94 The issue of prejudice, being primarily a question of fact, should be resolved by the district court in the first instance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.
(2×)
See Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969). 8 The issue of prejudice, being primarily a question of fact, should be resolved by the district court in the first instance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Julius Korn v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.
(2×)
See Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854, 857 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Cadwell
See Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854, 858 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969); Francis v. Pan American Trinidad Oil Co., 392 F.Supp. 1252, 1258-59 (D.Del.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Robert Falzer
See United States v. Weersing, 415 F.2d 130, 134-135 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969); Ehlert, supra, 422 F.2d [332] at 335-336 (concurring opinion) [Ehlert v. United States, 422 F.2d 332 . (9th Cir. 1970) aff’d 402 U.S. 99 , 91 S.Ct. 1319 , 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971)]; United States v. Maine, 417 F.2d 951, 953-954 (10th Cir. 1969); Clark v. Volatile, 427 F.2d 7 (3d Cir. 1970); Shook v. Allen, 307 F.Supp. 357 (N.D.Ohio 1969).” We have carefully reviewed the record in the light of other contentions urged by appellant and find them to be without m…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Joseph Stacer
See United States v. Weersing, 415 F.2d 130, 134-135 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969); Ehlert, supra, 422 F.2d at 335-336 (concurring opinion); United States v. Maine, 417 F.2d 951, 953-954 (10th Cir. 1969); Clark v. Volatile, 427 F.2d 7 (3rd Cir. 1970); Shook v. Allen, 307 F.Supp. 357 (N.D.Ohio 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Borough of Hamburg v. Trustees of the Presbytery
See Walter Reade, Inc. v. Twp. of Dennis, 36 N.J. 435, 440 , 177 A.2d 752 (1962) (exemptions for government agencies should be "liberally construed”); see also City of Newark v. Essex County Bd. of Tax'n, 54 N.J. 171, 187 , 254 A.2d 513 (1969) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969) (exemption must "expand when necessary").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Center for Molecular Med. v. Tp. of Belleville
See e.g., City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 54 N.J. 171, 186 , 254 A. 2d 513 cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Last Chance Development v. Kean
See also Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 54 N.J. 171, 174 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hampton v. Hanrahan
Compare Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (proposed defendant had no opportunity to investigate plaintiff’s claim before expiration of the limitations period).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Norton v. International Harvester Co.
See, e. g., Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854, 857-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Virginia Norton v. International Harvester Company
See, e. g., Craig v. United States, 413 F.2d 854, 857-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 987 , 90 S.Ct. 483 , 24 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weersing
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 634.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1969.
David Finkel and Hugh R. Manes for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.