green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Fonken v. Community Church of Kamrar
(8×)
See Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church in the United States, 225 Ga. 259 , 167 S.E.2d 658 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041 , 90 S.Ct. 680 , 24 L.Ed.2d 685 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paszel v. Laird
See United States v. Mulloy, 412 F.2d 421 (6 Cir. 1969), cert. granted, 396 U.S. 1036 , 90 S.Ct. 680 , 24 L.Ed.2d 680 (1970); United States v. Buckner, 415 F.2d 1175 10 Cir. 1969); Davis v. United States, 410 F.2d 89, 92-93 (8 Cir. 1969) 6 The converse of this rule is stated in 32 C.F.R. 1625.4: (If the board) is of the opinion that the information accompanying (the reopening) request fails to present any facts in addition to those considered when the registrant was classified, or, even if new facts are presented, the local board is of the opinion that such facts, if true, would not justify a …
discussed
Cited "see"
Paszel v. Laird
See United States v. Mulloy, 412 F.2d 421 (6 Cir. 1969), cert. granted, 396 U.S. 1036 , 90 S.Ct. 680 , 24 L.Ed.2d 680 (1970) ; United States v. Buckner, 415 F.2d 1175 10 Cir. 1969) ; Davis v. United States, 410 F.2d 89, 92-93 (8 Cir. 1969). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Mobilization Committee v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia
See, e. g., Benn v. Sankin, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 361 , 362, 410 F.2d 1060, 1061 (D.C.Cir.1969) (per curiam), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 685 (1970); Von der Heydt v. Kennedy, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 82, 299 F.2d 459, 463 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 916 , 82 S.Ct. 1554 , 8 L.Ed.2d 498 (1962). “[I]t is most exceptional for an appellate court to interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial court in determining this issue . . .” Harris v. Whiteman, 243 F.2d 563, 565 (5th Cir. 1957), rev’d per curiam on other grounds sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Presbyterian Church in the United States
v.
Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church
v.
Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church
No. 384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1970.
Robert B. Troutman, Charles L. Gowen, A. Felton Jenkins, Jr., and Frank S. Cheatham, Jr., for petitioners. Frank B. Zeigler and James Edward McAleer for Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church et al., and Owen H. Page for Eastern Heights Presbyterian Church et al., respondents. George Wilson McKeag for Thompson et al., and Jackson A. Dykman for Hines, as amici curiae in support of the petition. Alfred J. Schweppe for Laurelhurst United Presbyterian Church, Inc., et al. as amici curiae urging denial of the petition.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ga. Motion to use record in No. 71, October Term, 1968, granted. Motion of William P. Thompson, Stated Clerk of General Assembly of United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Rt. Rev. John E. Hines, Presiding Bishop of Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.