green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
June Roth v. Nathan Pritikin and Patrick M. McGrady Jr.
See Scherr v. Universal Match Corp., 417 F.2d 497, 500 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 936 , 90 S.Ct. 945 , 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Adrian Lee Guy v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri
See Featherston v. Mitchell, 418 F.2d 582, 585-586 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 945 , 25 L.Ed.2d 117 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. James Earl Reid
The critical questions for the “conservative interpretation” are whether the work was created at the commissioning party’s “instance and expense,” id. at 327 , and whether that party “had the right to direct and supervise the manner in which the work was being performed.” Id., quoting Murray v. Gelderman, 566 F.2d 1307, 1310 (5th Cir.1978) (“Actual exercise of [the] right [to direct and supervise the manner in which the work was being performed] is not controlling, and copyright is vested in the employer who has no intention of overseeing the detailed activity of any employee h…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Vance
See, e. g., Scherr v. Universal Match Corp., 417 F.2d 497, 500 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 936 , 90 S.Ct. 945 , 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970); Brattleboro Publishing Co. v. Winmill Publishing Corp., 369 F.2d 565, 567-68 (2d Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Eugene McEachern
See, e. g., Featherston v. Mitchell, 418 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 945 , 25 L.Ed.2d 117 (1970); United States v. Wilkins, 334 F.2d 698 (6th Cir. 1964); Lewellyng v. United States, supra; Caster v. United States, 319 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 972 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Kenner v. United States, 286 F.2d 208 (8th Cir. 1960); Krupnick v. United States, supra; Lebron v. United States, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 229 F.2d 16 (1955) cert. denied, 351 U.S. 974 , 76 S.Ct. 1035 , 100 L.Ed. 1492 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tidewater Construction Corp., trading as Tidewater-Raymond-Kiewit
v.
Duke
v.
Duke
No. 1054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1970.
R. Arthur Jett for petitioners. Henry E. Howell, Jr., and Willard J. Moody for respondent.
Published
Sup. Ct. App. Ya. Motion of respondent to dispense with printing brief in opposition granted. Certiorari denied.