green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
7.8 score
“plaintiff, including one who is seeking to act as class representative, must have individual standing to assert the claims in the complaint against each defendant being sued by him”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
MacOmber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.
plaintiff, including one who is seeking to act as class representative, must have individual standing to assert the claims in the complaint against each defendant being sued by him
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
predicate to appel-lee's right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Bruce A. Blackie, Richard Vinson, Edward Brough, and Charles L. Meador, No. 91-5846. Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, No. 91-5890
predicate to appellee's right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors Corporation
franchisor
cited
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Patrician Equities Corp.
See, Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734-37 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. Kauffman
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3rd Cir.1970) (“A plaintiff who is unable to secure standing for himself is certainly not in a position to ‘fairly ensure the adequate representation’ of those alleged to be similarly situated.”), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); see generally Note, Class Standing and the Class Representative, 94 Harv.L.Rev. 1637 (1981) and Note, Organizational Representation Suits: Labor Unions May Attack Employment Discrimination Without Having to Meet Rule 23 Requirements, 53 Ind.L.J. 113 (1977) (both discussin…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold R. Lott
See United States v. Weissman, 434 F.2d 175, 179 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 982 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 334 (1971). *720 Lott’s second challenge to his conviction is based on the alleged failure of the evidence to establish intent.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeMasi v. Weiss
Katz, 496 F.2d at 752 ; see Interpace Corp. v. City of Philadelphia, 438 F.2d 401 (3d Cir. 1971). 6 Cf. Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (class certification reversed in 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rocco J. Demasi, M.D., the 96 Other Subpoenaed Witnesses Identified in Exhibit a Hereto, Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2171 v. Malcolm Weiss, and Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2192 v. Malcolm Weiss, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal
Katz, 496 F.2d at 752 ; see Interpace Corp. v. City of Philadelphia, 438 F.2d 401 (3d Cir. 1971). 6 Cf. Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (class certification reversed in 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnesee v. Stop & Shop Cos., Inc.
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732 (3 Cir.1970), cert. den. 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 323 (1971); Schaffer v. Universal Rundle Corp., 397 F. 2d 893, 896 (5 Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re King Resources Co. Securities Litigation
See Kauffman *618 v. Dreyfus, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3rd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
Tri-County State Bank v. Hertz
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co., 657 A.2d 254, 265-66 (Del.1995) (emphasis added) (citing Anderson, 477 A.2d at 1047 ); see also Schilling v. Belcher, 582 F.2d 995, 1002 (5th Cir.1978) ("Standing is justified only by this proprietary interest created by the stockholder relationship and the possible indirect benefits the nominal plaintiff may acquire qua stockholder of the corporation which is the real party in interest.") (emphasis added) (quoting Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 735-36 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971)); Por…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pepe v. GMAC
See, e.g., Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 323 (1971); Ash v. I.B.M., 353 F. 2d 491 , 493- 494 (3d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 927 , 86 S.Ct. 1446 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 531 (1966); Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co., 183 F. 704, 709 (3d Cir.1910).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Angel Music, Inc. v. ABC Sports, Inc.
See also Chevalier v. Baird Savings Association, 66 F.R.D. 105 (E.D.Pa.1975) (Mortgagors had no standing to bring a class action against a class of all savings and loan associations and building and loan associations in the jurisdiction where named plaintiffs had not dealt with several members of the defendant class). 3 Similarly, the Third Circuit in Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) denied the named plaintiff, a shareholder in four mutual funds, the right to bring a class action against sixty-five mu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilder v. Bernstein
See, e. g., Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (securities action attempting to combine stockholder derivative class actions under Rule 23.1, Fed.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haas v. Pittsburgh National Bank
See also Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Leonard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 64 F.R.D. 432, 434-35 (S.D.N.Y.1974). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sweet v. Bermingham
See also, Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734-736 (3 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S. Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Page v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
See also Kauffman et al. v. Dreyfus Fund et al., 434 F.2d 727 (3 Cir. 1970) , cert. denied 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Kahan v. Rosenstiel, 424 F.2d 161 (3 Cir. 1970), cert. denied 398 U.S. 950 , 90 S.Ct. 1870 , 26 L.Ed.2d 290 (1970); De-Bremaecker v. Short, 433 F.2d 733 (5 Cir. 1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abbett, Sommer & Co., Inc.
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 1158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1971.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.