discussed Cited "see" United States v. Amos P. Brown, Sr. (2×) See note 26, infra. On this appeal, the Government asserts that Peacock’s testimony was admissible under the rule that evidence of commission of other crimes closely related in both time and nature to the crime charged may be admitted to establish identity, Halfen v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 556, 558 , cert. denied, 1964, 376 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 704 , 11 L.Ed.2d 653 , guilty knowledge, United States v. Dryden, 5 Cir. 1970, 423 F.2d 1175, 1178 , cert. denied, 398 U.S. 950 , 90 S.Ct. 1869 , 26 L.Ed.2d 290 , intent, United States v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 1266, 1270 , cert. de…