discussed Cited "see" Estate of Stoller v. Ford Motor Co. See Bela Seating Co. v. Poloron Products, Inc., 297 F.Supp. 489 , 160 U.S.P.Q. 646 (N.D.Ill.1968), aff'd, 438 F.2d 733 , 168 U.S.P.Q. 548 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 2228 , 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Stuart W.

discussed Cited "see" Lula Belle Hull, of the Estate of R.D. Hull, Deceased, M.H. Parry, and H.A. Binford v. Brunswick Corporation See generally Bela Seating Co. v. Poloron Products, Inc., 438 F.2d 733, 739 (7th Cir.) (“A licensor may restrict the licensee’s manufacture of the patented item to a specific use or design.”), cer t. denied, 403 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 2228 , 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).

cited Cited "see" MacLaren v. B-I-W Group Inc. See Bela Seating Company v. Poloron Products, Inc., 297 F.Supp. 489, 507 (N. D.Ill.1968), aff’d, 438 F.2d 733 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 2228 , 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Laird Taylor We find no merit in appellant’s contention. “[I]t is not the function of the judiciary to review the exercise of executive discretion * * Newman v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 263 , 382 F.2d 479, 482 (1967); see Waterhouse v. Mitchell, No. 14,872 (4 Cir., Feb. 16, 1971), cert. den. 403 U.S. 918 , 91 S.Ct. 2228 , 29 L.Ed.2d 695 (1971).