green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General of the United States v. Covington & Burling
See Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir. 1970), aff’d mem. by equally divided court, 400 U.S. 955 , 91 S.Ct. 351 , 27 L.Ed.2d 263 , rehearing denied, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Bernard M. Decker, United States District Judge v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
See 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Company, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
Miss., 1970); see also Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 7 Cir. 1970, 423 F.2d 487 , aff’d by equally divided court, 1971, 400 U.S. 348 , 91 S.Ct. 479 , 27 L.Ed.2d 433 , reh. denied, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 ; see generally, Wright & Miller, 8 Federal Practice & Procedure § 2024; and non-department heads, cf. United States v. Morgan, supra, does not preclude the Board from claiming a qualified privilege for its investigative work files.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grove Press, Inc.
v.
Flask
v.
Flask
No. 360.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1971.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Motion of appellee Gilmartin to amend his original motion to dismiss or affirm granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.