United Mine Workers v. Railing, 401 U.S. 486 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United Mine Workers v. Railing, 401 U.S. 486 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Cite instead
Still-good law most often cited alongside it: Cope (1947)
195 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 47 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Tamasha Town and Country Club, Bankrupt. Don Rothman, Trustee v. United States (ca9, 1973-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) In Re Tamasha Town and Country Club, Bankrupt. Don Rothman, Trustee v. United States (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1973 · confidence medium
The Court held that the Bankruptcy Act is “an overriding statement of federal policy on this question of priorities” and made reference to “the strong policy of § 64(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Act.” ( 401 U.S. at 515, 517 , 91 S.Ct. at 992, 994 ; see also Nicholas v. United States (1966) 384 U.S. 678, 691 , 86 S.Ct. 1674, 1683 , 16 L.Ed.2d 853 .) The opinion traced the history of legislative change which has continuously subordinated tax claims and elevated the priority of administrative costs and expenses, concluding “We think the statutory policy of subordinating taxes to costs and e…
cited Cited "see" In re Living Hope Southeast, LLC
Bankr. E.D. Ark. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 [(1971)].
cited Cited "see" In Re Estate of Romani
Pa. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971) (specific priorities of the Bankruptcy Act override the general priority of the United States under section 3466).
cited Cited "see" Matter of United Imports, Inc.
Bankr. D. Neb. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 [(1971)].
cited Cited "see" In Re Sunrise Paving, Inc.
Bankr. D. Md. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971) (dealing with tax fund trusts under the Bankruptcy Act).
cited Cited "see" Kalish v. Landing (In Re Landing)
Bankr. E.D. Mo. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
VI, cl. 2; see United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" In Re McLean Industries, Inc.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , *426 517 91 S.Ct. 991, 994 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971); Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Chicago Express, Inc., (In re Chicago Express, Inc., 332 F.2d 276 (2d Cir.1964); In re Pusey and Jones Corp., 295 F.2d 479 (3d Cir.1961).
discussed Cited "see" Sicherman v. Jelm (In Re Harvard Manufacturing Corp.)
Bankr. N.D. Ohio · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See, U.S. v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971); Drabkin v. District of Columbia, 824 F.2d 1102, 1106 (D.C.Cir.1987); Slodov v. U.S., 436 U.S. 238, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 1778, 1789 , 56 L.Ed.2d 251 (1978); In re E & S Comfort, Inc., 92 B.R. 616 (Bankr.E.D.Pa. 1988), citing, In re American International Airways, Inc., 83 B.R. 324 (Bankr.E.D.
cited Cited "see" In Re Vermont Fiberglass, Inc.
Bankr. D. Vt. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971); Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. 238 , 98 S.Ct 1778 , 56 L.Ed.2d 251 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Docter v. United States (In Re Design Store Corp.)
Bankr. D. Md. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Randall, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Bistate Oil Co. v. Heston Oil Co. (In Re Heston Oil Co.)
Bankr. N.D. Okla · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 ; In re Mulligan, 116 F. 715 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Air Florida, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Randall, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wyoming National Bank of Wilkes-Barre
Pa. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971) (specific priorities of the Bankruptcy Act override the general priority of the United States under § 3466); United States v. S.K.A.
examined Cited "see" Cox v. Stanton (3×)
E.D.N.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Railing v. United Mine Workers of America, 429 F.2d 780 (4th Cir. 1970), remanded 401 U.S. 486 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 272 (1971), on remand 445 F.2d 353 (4th Cir. 1971); Rawlings v. Ray, 312 U.S. 96 , 61 S.Ct. 473 , 85 L.Ed. 605 (1940); Cope v. Anderson, 331 U.S. 461 , 67 S.Ct. 1340 , 91 L.Ed. 1602 (1946); Vanderboom v. Sexton, 422 F.2d 1233 (8th Cir. 1970) ; Azalea Meats, Inc. v. Muscat, 386 F.2d 5 (5th Cir. 1967); Jackson v. Duke, 259 F.2d 3 (5th Cir. 1958); Fitzgerald v. Appolonia, 323 F.Supp. 1269 (E.D.Pa. 1971) .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Freedomland, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971) and Nicholas v. United States, 384 U.S. 678 , 86 S.Ct. 1674 , 16 L.Ed.2d 853 (1966), and cases cited infra where the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction over similar claims was apparently unchallenged.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Major Dynamics, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Official Creditors Committee v. Herbert Tuchinsky, Defendant-Third-Party v. Martin Goldberg, Trustee of the Estate of Major Dynamics, Inc., Debtor, Third-Party
3rd Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re R & T Roofing Structures & Commercial Framing, Inc., 887 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513, 515-17 , 91 S.Ct. 991, 993-94 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (under Bankruptcy Act, government was not entitled to statutory trust when debtor failed to segregate post-petition withholding tax funds); Drabkin v. District of Columbia, 824 F.2d 1102, 1115 (D.C.Cir.1987) (tracing of pre-petition withholding funds is required, but the government is entitled to make "reasonable assumptions").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Official Creditors Committee v. Tuchinsky (In re Major Dynamics, Inc.)
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re R & T Roofing Structures & Commercial Framing, Inc., 887 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513, 515-17 , 91 S.Ct. 991, 993-94 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (under Bankruptcy Act, government was not entitled to statutory trust when debtor failed to segregate post-petition withholding tax funds); Drabkin v. District of Columbia, 824 F.2d 1102,1115 (D.C.Cir.1987) (tracing of pre-pe-tition withholding funds is required, but the government is entitled to make “reasonable assumptions”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harry P. Begier, Jr., Trustee v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 [, 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 ] (1973), [ (1971) ] ...
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.
Bankr. D. Vt. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also U.S. v. Randall 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. United States (In Re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co.)
Bankr. E.D. Ark. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 , 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 (1973) (sic.) and In re Tamasha Town and Country Club, 483 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir.1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Olsen v. Deutscher (In Re Nashville White Trucks, Inc.)
Bankr. M.D. Tenn. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 [ 91 S.Ct. 991 , 28 L.Ed.2d 273 ] (1973) and In re Tamasha Town and Country Club, 483 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA
v.
RAILING Et Al., Dba C & P COAL CO.
1059.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1971.
401 U.S. 486
Harlan.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition, for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., ante, p. 321. Both § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 158, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 187, and § 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 15, give a cause of action for injury to business or property. Whether suits under the two statutes are distinguishable for purposes of determining the time at which a cause of action accrues warrants further exploration by the Court of Appeals. Further attention should also be given to the question of why a § 303 cause of action has sufficiently accrued to bring suit as soon as the plaintiff suffers damage but has not sufficiently accrued to start the running of the statute of limitations on the damages already suffered and for which suit may be but is not brought. •

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Harlan would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and set the case for argument on the merits.