discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sandoval See United States v. Marquez, 319 F.Supp. 1016, 1020-22 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (criticizing the De Luna dicta, the court stated that no right exists, even in a separate trial, to comment upon a co-defendant’s assertion of constitutional privilege), aff'd, 449 F.2d 89 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 963 , 92 S.Ct. 1167 , 31 L.Ed.2d 239 (1972).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stephen Hathaway, United States of America v. Howard Baptista See United States v. Marquez, 449 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 963 , 92 S.Ct. 1167 , 31 L.Ed.2d 239 (1972); United States v. De Cavalcante, 440 F.2d 1264 (3d Cir. 1971); 18 U.S.C. § 2 (b).

discussed Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Stephen Radich v. The Criminal Court of the City of New York (2×) Accord, Biggers v. Neil, 448 F.2d 91, 97 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. granted, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1167 , 31 L.Ed.2d 230 (1972).