green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1916 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1916
1971
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Kansas City Terminal Elevator Company v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 444 F.2d 328, 331 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 542 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Joe Harold Williams v. Lloyd Eaton, as Football Coach of the University of Wyoming
See Sword v. Fox, 446 F.2d 1091, 1097, 1098 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berry v. American Commercial Barge Lines
Co. (2d Cir.1939), 107 F.2d 999 , with Sweeney v. American Steamship Co. (6th Cir.1974), 491 F.2d 1085 ) or as undergoing repairs of such a major character as to amount to a withdrawal from navigation ( Wixom v. Boland Marine & Manufacturing Co. (5th Cir.1980), 614 F.2d 956 ; see also Delome v. Union Barge Line Co. (5th Cir.1971), 444 F.2d 225 , cert. denied (1971), 404 U.S. 995 , *362 30 L.Ed.2d 547 , 92 S.Ct. 534 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gay Students Organization of the University of New Hampshire v. Bonner
Compare Sword v. Fox, 446 F.2d 1091, 1099-1100 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971), with Soglin v. Kauffman, 418 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1969). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yonofsky v. Wernick
See, e. g., Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225 , 233 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); DeVries v. Starr, 393 F.2d 9, 10-11 (10th Cir. 1968); Pattiz v. Schwartz, 386 F.2d 300 , 301 (8th Cir. 1968); White v. Fawcett Publications, 324 F.Supp. 403, 404-406 (W.D.Mo.1971); Holm v. Shilensky, 269 F.Supp. 359, 360-361 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff’d, 388 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph N. Palladino, Joseph N. Palladino, Jr.
See also United States v. Manarite, 448 F.2d 583, 593 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 947 , 92 S.Ct. 281 , 30 L.Ed.2d 264 (1971) 8 He adds the necessary caveat, "Of course the testimony of experts would not displace judge or jury in determining the ultimate question whether the particular book is obscene, any more than the testimony of experts relating to the state of the art in patent suits determines the patentability of a controverted device." 361 U.S. at 165 , 80 S.Ct. at 225 9 Defendants assert that the Supreme Court in Wiener v. California, 404 U.S. 988 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 539 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wiener
v.
California
v.
California
No. 71-443.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1971.
Blackmun, White.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of San Diego. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 (1967).
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Blackmun dissent.