green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“articles ... tending to establish the identify of the persons in control of the premises ... including but not limited to utility company receipts, rent receipts, cancelled mail envelopes, and keys”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
articles ... tending to establish the identify of the persons in control of the premises ... including but not limited to utility company receipts, rent receipts, cancelled mail envelopes, and keys
discussed
Cited "see"
Hibernia National Bank v. John W. Carner
(2×)
In fact, "[t]he partners of an existing partnership may not be sued on a partnership obligation unless the partnership is joined as a defendant." La.Code Civ.P.Ann. art. 737 (1960 & Supp.1993); see Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen International Co., 329 F.Supp. 981, 984 (W.D.La.) ("[A] judgment cannot be obtained against a member of a partnership upon a partnership obligation, while the partnership exists, except by also obtaining a judgment against the partnership itself”), aff'd, 449 F.2d 1289 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 715 , 30 L.Ed.2d 739 (1972); Travelers Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Carner
In fact, "[t]he partners of an existing partnership may not be sued on a partnership obligation unless the partnership is joined as a defendant." LA.CODE CIV.P.ANN. art. 737 (1960 & Supp.1993); see Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen International Co., 329 F.Supp. 981, 984 (W.D.La.) ("[A] judgment cannot be obtained against a member of a partnership upon a partnership obligation, while the partnership exists, except by also obtaining a judgment against the partnership itself"), aff'd, 449 F.2d 1289 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 715 , 30 L.Ed.2d 739 (1972); Travelers Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Zuccarini
(2×)
See United States v Honore, 450 F2d 31, 33 (CA 9, 1971), cert den 404 US 1048 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Jose Ramirez
See United States v. Honore, 450 F.2d 31 , 33-34 n. 1 (9 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 728 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. Owen
See generally Goss v. Lopez, supra, 419 U.S. at 574, 92 S.Ct. 729 ; Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570-71 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 342 , 89 S.Ct. 1820 , 23 L.Ed.2d 349 (1969) (Harlan, J., concurring) .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Myles v. Twomey
Accord, United States v. Honore, 450 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 728 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972) (pair of license plates and carbine not described in the warrant and unrelated to the crime under investigation were validly seized); United States v. Zeidman, 444 F.2d 1051 (7th Cir. 1970) (seizure of a short barreled rifle was valid, even though the warrant made no specific mention of it); Ludwig v. Wainwright, 434 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1970) (stolen property other than that specifically described in the warrant was validly seized); United States v. Berry, 423 F.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Thomas Chitwood
See Barker v. Wingo, 442 F.2d 1141, 1142 (6th Cir. 1971) and cases cited therein, cert. granted, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 729 (1972). 2) Jencks Act At trial the prosecutor refused to turn over certain FBI reports asserted by Chitwood to be producible under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 . 1 A defense motion for production of Jencks material imposes on the trial judge an affirmative duty to conduct a non-adversary hearing, out of the presence of the jury, to ascertain whether documents in the possession of the Government are Jencks Act “statements.” Campbell v. United St…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Polly v. Navarro
See also Lippitt v. Cipollone, 337 F. Supp. 1405 (N.D.Ohio 1971), aff'd mem., 404 U.S. 1032 , 92 S.Ct. 729 , 30 L.Ed.2d 725 (1972) (upholding four-year disaffiliation requirement for candidates); Bendinger v. Ogilvie, 335 F. Supp. 572 (N.D.Ill. 1971) (upholding two-year disaffiliation requirement for candidates, and discussing compelling reasons in support thereof).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Namen v. State
Compare United States v. Honore, 450 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 728 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972) with State v. Kealoha, 62 Hawaii 166 , 613 P.2d 645 (Hawaii 1980). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mrazek v. Suffolk County Board Of Elections
See also Lippitt v. Cipollone, 337 F.Supp. 1405, 1406 (N.D.Ohio 1971), aff'd, 404 U.S. 1032 , 92 S.Ct. 729 , 30 L.Ed.2d 725 (1972); Bendinger v. Ogilvie, 335 F.Supp. 572, 575 (N.D.Ill.1971); and see Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Jenness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 , 91 S.Ct. 1970 , 29 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Restivo v. Conservative Party of the State of New York, 391 F.Supp. 813 (S.D.N.Y.1975). 10 Judge Weinstein did not address the question of Mrazek's and Migliore's standing, in all likelihood because Fitzpatrick and Holzmacher are plainly proper parties to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mrazek v. Suffolk County Board of Elections
See also Lippitt v. Cipollone, 337 F.Supp. 1405, 1406 (N.D.Ohio 1971), aff'd, 404 U.S. 1032 , 92 S.Ct. 729 , 30 L.Ed.2d 725 (1972); Bendinger v. Ogilvie, 335 F.Supp. 572, 575 (N.D.Ill.1971); and see Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Jenness v. Fort- sou, 403 U.S. 431 , 91 S.Ct. 1970 , 29 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Restivo v. Conservative Party of the State of New York, 391 F.Supp. 813 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nader v. Schaffer
In the regulated situation, the state has a legitimate interest in protecting party members’ associational rights, by legislating to protect the party “from intrusion by those with adverse political principles.” Ray v. Blair, supra, 343 U.S. at 221-22 , 72 S.Ct. at 658 ; see also Lippitt v. Cipollone, 337 F.Supp. 1405, 1406 (N.D.Ohio 1971) (three-judge court) (per curiam), aff’d mem., 404 U.S. 1032 , 92 S.Ct. 729 , 30 L.Ed.2d 725 (1972); Green v. State of Texas, 351 F.Supp. 143, 145 (N.D.Tex.1972) (three-judge court) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Warren Thompson
Compare, e.g., the warrants described in United States v. James, supra, and United States v. Honore, 450 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 728 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Herhal
Compare United States v. Honore, 450 F.2d 31 , (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 728 , 30 L.Ed.2d 746 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGovern
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-5514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.