green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parker
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 737, 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Biaggi
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 825 (5th Cir.1971) (“When there is a complete absence or 'spectacular’ underrepresentation of Negroes on juries, the courts have read the figures as establishing a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination____”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) and United States v. Gruberg, 493 F.Supp. 234, 245 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (suggesting that total exclusion or statistically substantial underrepresentation would be sufficient alone to establish a prima facie case but that a less significant disparity would have to be buttress…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. Onett
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (one need receive no personal benefit to be guilty of extortion).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34, cert. denied, 1972, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 , and eases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34, Cert. denied, 1972, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 , and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harlan Duhon and Donald Ray Lovett
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir., 1971, 448 F.2d 815, 834 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972): “[t]he jury could infer that these people knew of the general pattern of extortion and sought out Hyde with the knowledge that they would have to deal with him eventually . . . 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Lloyd Davis
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir., 1971, 448 F.2d 815, 847 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Capo, Tadeusz Snacki, A/K/A \Ted Snacki\"
(2×)
Yet if the defendant purports to have the power to hurt the victim in economic terms and fear is induced, the solicitation becomes an extortionate demand. 49 540 F.2d at 51 n. 11; see also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 833 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure “for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records”) with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure "for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records") with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748 , 756 (5th Cir.1978), modified on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); see also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 838 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nelson
See also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 825 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972), in which the court noted that “[w]hen there is a complete absence or ‘spectacular’ underrepresentation of Negroes on juries, the courts have read the figures as establishing a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination on the theory that discrimination ... is the most reasonable explanation for the composition of the jury system under scrutiny (footnote omitted).” 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dominic Biondo and Willie Francisco Orlando
See also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1021 , 90 S.Ct. 1258 , 25 L.Ed.2d 530 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State Board of Election Commissioners
v.
Evers
v.
Evers
No. 71-600.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1972.
Published
Appeal from D. C. S. D. Miss. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.