green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Castro v. Sangles
See Inter-Continental Promotions, Inc. v. Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank, 441 F.2d 1356 , 1361 (5th Cir.1971) (participants in a boxing match who knowingly engaged in "subterfuge" to bring event within statutory exception, barred from recovery against promoters of illegal fight), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 850 , 92 S.Ct. 85 , 30 L.Ed.2d 89 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See also SEC v. First Securities Co. of Chicago, 463 F.2d 981, 987 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 880 , 92 S.Ct. 85 , 34 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972) (“we have no doubt that [the defendant primarily liable], being the employee of [the Section 20(a) defendant] as its president, was ‘controlled’ by [the Section 20(a) defendant] within the intendment of section 20(a)”); Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 738 (8th Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968) (Section 20(a) requires “only some indirect means of discipline or influence short of actual direction to …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Quinn
See also United States v. Coley, 441 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 867 , 92 S.Ct. 85 , 30 L.Ed.2d 111 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacheco
v.
Pacheco
v.
Pacheco
No. 71-18.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1971.
Douglas, Noted, Set, Should.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and case set for oral argument.