green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Jorgenson 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir.1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 ; See also Fillmore v. Crisp, 480 F. Supp. 310 (W.D.Okla. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Jones, Robert Glen Hyams, Connie Janko, Tommy Duane Ramsey, Deborah Sue Ramsey and Conrad Janko
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972); United States v. Bryant, 364 F.2d 598 (4th Cir. 1966); 8 Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.06[2].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972). 7 There was no violation of Rule 43(a) prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellants.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lee Brown, United States of America v. Terry Francis Gallagher, United States of America v. Clayton Colwell, Jr., United States of America v. James Adams, Iii, United States of America v. Donald E. Pitts, United States of America v. Kenneth L. Hale
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972). 7 17 There was no violation of Rule 43(a) prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellants.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Santo Polizzi v. United States of America, Emprise Corporation v. United States
See United States v. Jorgenson, 10 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 516, 520-21 , cert. denied, 1972, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cowman
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972); Washington Times Co. v. Bonner, 66 App.D.C. 280 , 86 F.2d 836 (1936); People v. Fiore, 176 Cal.App.2d 536 , 1 Cal.Rptr. 351 (1959); Harris v. Commonwealth, 411 S.W.2d 924 (Ky.1967); State v. Lupino, 268 Minn. 344 , 129 N.W.2d 294 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 681 , 13 L.Ed.2d 569 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Loken Freed
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 ; Jones v. United States, 299 F.2d 661 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 864 , 83 S.Ct. 123 , 9 L.Ed.2d 101 ; reh. denied, 371 U.S. 931 , 83 S.Ct. 294 , 9 L.Ed.2d 239 . 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Ibarra Vasquez
Id.; see also United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) (defendant has no right to be present at in camera conference on evidentiary matters when his *849 lawyer was present at the conference).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paulino Izaguirre Rojas v. Robert Richardson, Kenneth McGee and M and R Cattle Company, a Partnership
See also Jenkins v. General Motors Corp., 446 F.2d 377 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) (a timely objection generally is required to preserve appealability); United States v. Rayborn, 310 F.2d 339 (6th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 952 , 83 S.Ct. 1683 , 10 L.Ed.2d 707 (1963) (accord) (prosecutor’s statements at trial).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald w.jordan
See also, United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) ; United States v. Dickens, 417 F.2d 958 (8 Cir. 1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Motors Corp.
v.
Jenkins
v.
Jenkins
No. 71-820.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1972.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.