Voege v. United States, 409 U.S. 986 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Voege v. United States, 409 U.S. 986 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Raymond Amerson-Bey (ca8, 1990-03-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Raymond Amerson-Bey
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 464 F.2d 222, 224 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 339 , 34 L.Ed.2d 252 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Johnson.
D.D.C. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Rec. 444 (1964) (remarks of Representative Moore) (bill will serve fundamental right of representation by counsel); id. at 445 (remarks of Representative Moore) (citing Sixth Amendment in argument supporting bill); id. at 448 (remarks of Representative Celler) (same); id. at 453 (remarks of Representative Poff) (favors bill because it is consistent with Supreme Court decisions implementing constitutional right to counsel); accord, United States v. O’Clair, 451 F.2d 485, 486 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 339 , 34 L.Ed.2d 252 (1972); United States v. Durant, 545 F.2d 8…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Luther Wilkins, Morris Lewis, and Sam Gates, Jr.
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. O’Clair, 451 F.2d 485 (1st Cir. 1971) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 339 , 34 L.Ed.2d 252 (1972). 2 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Huff
6th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Featherston, 461 F.2d 1119, 1121 (5th Cir.1972) (holding that the mens rea requirement of § 231(a)(1) is neither vague nor over-broad), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 339 , 34 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976); United States v. Mechanic, 454 F.2d 849, 852 (8th Cir.1971) (holding that § 231(a)(3), which prohibits interference with law enforcement, “has no application to speech, but applies only to violent physical acts”); Nat’l Mobilization Comm. to End War in Viet Nam v. Foran, 411 F.2d 934, 937 (7th Cir.1969) (finding § 231(a)(3) not to be vague).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Banks
D.S.D. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Featherston, 461 F.2d 1119 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 339 , 34 L.Ed.2d 258 (1972), holding that Section 231(a)(3) is not unconstitutional on its face because the statute requires intent and does not cover mere inadvertent conduct. 461 F.2d 1122 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Voege
v.
United States
No. 72-5228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1972.
409 U.S. 986
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.