green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 230 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972); United States v. Taylor, 90 F.3d 903, 909 (4th Cir. 1996); Jerez, supra, 108 F.3d at 691 ; United States v. Cormier, 220 F.3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1174 , 121 S.Ct. 1146 , 148 L.Ed.2d 1009 (2001); United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hogan
See United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 230 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 95-1961
See United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 230 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972) (holding that observations by law enforcement officers through window adjacent to front door and on porch did not constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment because the officers "were in a place where they had a right to be, and ... whatever they saw through the window was in plain sight"); cf. United States v. Bradshaw, 490 F.2d 1097, 1100 (4th Cir.) (recognizing that law enforcement officers "were clearly entitled to go onto defendant's…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 230 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972) (holding that observations by law enforcement officers through window adjacent to front door and on porch did not constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment because the officers “were in a place where they had a right to be, and ... whatever they saw through the window was in plain sight”); cf. United States v. Bradshaw, 490 F.2d 1097, 1100 (4th Cir.) (recognizing that law enforcement officers “were clearly entitled to go onto defen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Edison Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union 563, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Intervenor
(2×)
See Texaco, Inc. v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 812, 815 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Coors Container Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Aluminum Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
Accord, Texaco, Inc. v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 812 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tommy Joe Coplen, United States of America v. Henry Valentin Valenzuela, United States of America v. John Balmer McKittrick
The officers did not intrude upon any reasonable expectation of privacy in this case by observing with their eyes the activities visible through the window. ft 409 F.2d at 625 ; see United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 229-30 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Odell Marshall
“We must presume that the jury followed the court’s instruction.” Cook v. United States, 354 F.2d 529, 532 (9th Cir. 1965), following, Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 371 U.S. 341, 367 , 83 S.Ct. 448, 463-64 , 9 L.Ed.2d 357, 374-75 (1963); see United States v. Hersh, 464 F.2d 228, 232 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 442 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perillo et ux.
v.
United American Life Insurance Co.
v.
United American Life Insurance Co.
No. 72-380.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1972.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.