discussed Cited as authority (rule) Stephanie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. General Robert E. CUSHMAN, Jr., Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Appellee (2×) In the first of these, Struck v. Secretary of Defense, 460 F.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. granted, 409 U.S. 947 , 93 S.Ct. 292 , 34 L.Ed.2d 217 , vacated and remanded, 409 U.S. 1071 , 93 S.Ct. 676 , 34 L.Ed.2d 660 (1972), it was held that the mandatory discharge rule for pregnant WAFs was constitutional, but the case was vacated and remanded for consideration of the issue of mootness “in light of the position presently asserted by the Government,” 409 U.S. at 1071, 93 S.Ct. at 676, after the Air Force ordered Captain Struck’s retention in service.

discussed Cited "see" Aiello v. Hansen (2×) See Struck v. Secretary of Defense, 460 F.2d 1377, 1379 (9th Cir. 1972) (Duniway, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded to consider mootness, 409 U.S. 1071 , 93 S.Ct. 676 , 34 L.Ed.2d 660 (1972).