green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. James Walter Scott
(2×)
But see South Dakota v. Long, 465 F.2d 65, 72 (8th Cir. 1972), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Imboden v. Romines
See Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 . 4 The state, obviously, can use his admissions as “admissions” where deemed appropriate and where the rules of evidence permit.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Paris
(2×)
See Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972) (no such responsibility), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. McManus, 560 F.2d 747 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 894 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); United States v. Burroughs, 650 F.2d 595 , 597 n. 3 (5th Cir.1981) (confrontation clause never bars statements admissible under rule 801(d)(2)(E)); United States v. Chiavola, 744 F.2d 1271, 1275-76 (7th Cir.1984) (same). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Linscott
See Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273-74 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973) (witness’s waiver of Fifth Amendment privilege at his own previous trial did not preclude him from claiming the privilege when called to testify at trial of alleged co-conspirator, at which time witness’s motion to vacate his sentence was pending and possibility of a retrial existed).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sihadej Chindawongse A/K/A Rajburi, United States of America v. Boripat Siripan
See Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Peacock, 654 F.2d 339, 349-350 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 404 , 78 L.Ed.2d 344 (1983); United States v. Xheka, 704 F.2d 974 , 987 n. 7 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 486 , 78 L.Ed.2d 682 (1983); United States v. Pavia, 560 F.2d 827 , 836 n. 3 (7th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacobson v. Director, Bureau of Mediation Services
See, Toney v. Reagan, 467 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1953) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973) (distinguishing between actions remedial in nature and those designed to forestall a deprivation of a constitutional right, requiring exhaustion in the latter case); Fuentes v. Roher, 519 F.2d 379, 386 (2d Cir. 1975) (requiring exhaustion in § 1983 actions at least where administrative remedy is adequate).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard William Landof
See United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1972); McConney v. United States, 421 F.2d 248 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 821 , 91 S.Ct. 39 , 27 L.Ed.2d 49 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Gregory v. Mitchell
See Toney v. Reagan, 467 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973); Parker v. Letson, 380 F.Supp. 280 (N.D.Ga.1974). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sally A. Papia, Russell J. Enea, Joseph v. Basile, and Maximillion J. Adonnis
Accord, Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Cox, 449 F.2d 679, 688-89 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934 , 92 S.Ct. 1783 , 32 L.Ed.2d 136 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Speerschneider
See, Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (“The federal co-conspirator rule . . . does not violate the confrontation clause”); United States v. Clayton, 450 F.2d 16 (1st Cir. 1971); United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 (3rd Cir. 1970) cert. den., 402 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 1524 , 28 L.Ed.2d 867 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Jackson Crane
(2×)
See United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158, 1167-1170 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973). 25 I would reverse and remand with instructions to grant a new trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) Huff
(2×)
See Ottomano v. United States, 1 Cir. 1972, 468 F.2d 269, 273 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 ; United States v. Clayton, 1 Cir. 1971, 450 F.2d 16, 20 , cert. denied, 405 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 1200 , 31 L.Ed.2d 250 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. Kaplan
See Ottonamo v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Pugliese, 153 F.2d 497, 500 (2d Cir. 1945).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael L. Principe
See Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lambright v. Lewis
See, e.g., United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1972) (upholding the multiple jury procedure where the trial judge carefully instructed the panels), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); United States v. Hayes, 676 F.2d 1359, 1367 (11th Cir.) (concurring with Sidman and affirming convictions due to lack of prejudice flowing from multiple juries), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1040 , 103 S.Ct. 455 , 74 L.Ed.2d 608 (1982); Byrne v. Matczak, 254 F.2d 525, 529 (3d Cir.) (ruling novel use of multiple juries not unconstitutional without particularized harm), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ewish v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158, 1170 (9th Cir.1972) (finding authority under Fed.R.Crim.P. 57, granting trial court power to "proceed in any manner not inconsistent" with rules), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973); Harris, 255 Cal.Rptr. at 365 , 767 P.2d at 633 (interpreting California Penal Code § 1098, requiring that defendants "must be tried jointly, unless the court orders separate trials").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Adkins v. State
See also Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Harris
(2×)
Motlagh v. United States, 464 U.S. 996 , 104 S.Ct. 492 , 78 L.Ed.2d 686 ; see also, United States v. Sidman, 9th Cir., 470 F.2d 1158 , cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Jackson v. Samuel I. Hayakawa, Etc.
See, e.g., Wong v. Hayakawa, 464 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 938 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973); Jackson v. Hayakawa, 605 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 1601 , 63 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (“Jackson I ”); Jackson v. Hayakawa, 682 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir.1982) (“Jackson II”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ammar
Compare United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 , 836 n. 3 (7th Cir.1977) (congruent) and Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1129 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973) (congruent) with United States v. Perez, 658 F.2d 654 , 660 & n. 5 (9th Cir.1981) (not congruent) and United States v. Wright, 588 F.2d 31, 37-38 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 1236 , 59 L.Ed.2d 467 (1979) (not congruent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lambright
(2×)
See also United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1127 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973) (holds procedure satisfies each of defendant’s constitutional rights, including rights to impartial jury and due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ammar
Compare United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 , 836 n. 3 (7th Cir.1977) (congruent) and Ottomano v. United States, 468 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1129 , 93 S.Ct. 948 , 35 L.Ed.2d 260 (1973) (congruent) with United States v. Perez, 658 F.2d 654 , 660 & n. 5 (9th Cir. 1981) (not congruent) and United States v. Wright, 588 F.2d 31, 37-38 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 1236 , 59 L.Ed.2d 467 (1979) (not congruent).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lightcap
See, e. g., Toney v. Reagan, 467 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973); Whitner v. Davis, 410 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Ricketts v. Lightcap
See, e. g., Toney v. Reagan, 467 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973); Whitner v. Davis, 410 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lingo v. Boone
See also Toney v. Reagan, 467 F.2d 953, 956 (9 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1130 , 93 S.Ct. 951 , 35 L.Ed.2d 263 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 72-5669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1973.
Certiorari.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.