green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Conkey v. Hoak Motors, Inc.
Co., 45 Neb. 487 , 63 N.W. 859, 859 (1895); accord The “Idaho,” 3 Otto 575 , 581, 93 U.S. 575, 581 , 93 S.Ct. 978 , 980, 23 L.Ed. 978, 980 (1876); Jensen v. Eagle Ore Co., 47 Colo. 306 , 107 P. 259 , 260 (1910).
discussed
Cited "see"
Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark Insurance
We do not think that appellants’ allegations, even if true, can be deemed to establish a deliberately planned and carefully executed scheme to “defile the court.” The discovery violations alleged by appellants affect only the individual parties; they do not threaten either the court’s ability to function or the interests of the general public. “[All-legations of nondisclosure in pretrial discovery will not support an action for fraud on the court.” Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir.1985) (citation omitted), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1086 , 106 S.Ct. 862 , 88 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryan v. Iowa District Court for Winneshiek County
(2×)
See Thorp Credit, Inc. v. Barr, 200 N.W.2d 535, 536-37 (Iowa 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 978 , 35 L.Ed.2d 581 (1973); In re Fenton’s Estate, 182 Iowa 346, 358-59 , 165 N.W. 463 , 466 (1917).
examined
Cited "see"
Matter of Estate of Dull
(4×)
See Thorp Credit, Inc. v. Barr, 200 N.W.2d 535, 536 (Iowa 1972), cert. dismissed, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 978 , 35 L.Ed.2d 581 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Montana Consumer Counsel v. United States
See North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. ICC, 347 F.Supp. 103, 111-12 (E.D.N.C.1972) (three-judge court), aff’d, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1362 , 35 L.Ed.2d 528 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montana Consumer Counsel v. United States
See North Carolina Utilities Comm'n v. ICC, 347 F.Supp. 103, 111-12 (E.D.N.C.1972) (three-judge court), Aff'd, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1362 , 35 L.Ed.2d 528 (1973). 13 The order of the Commission is AFFIRMED. * Honorable Albert S. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Utah, sitting by designation
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. Rhode Island
This claim brings into the spotlight among the most basic tenets of the Due Process Clause: that an individual be given a “meaningful” opportunity for a hearing, Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 , 85 S.Ct. 1187, 1191 , 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); and that “an individual be given the opportunity for a hearing before he is deprived of any significant property interest.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 542 , 105 S.Ct. at 1493 (quoting Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 389 , 91 S.Ct. 780, 792 , 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971) (emphasis in original)); see also Warner v. Trombetta, 348 F.Supp. 1068, 1071 (M…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walters v. Edwards
Compare Prigmore v. Renfro, 356 F.Supp. 427 (N.D.Ala.1972), aff’d mem., 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1369 , 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973) [rational relationship test, statute constitutional] ; with Turner v. Fouche, 396 U.S. 346 , 90 S.Ct. 532 , 24 L.Ed.2d 567 (1970) [rational relationship test, statute unconstitutional] and Frontiero v. Richardson, supra [compelling state interest test, regulation unconstitutional]. 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vail v. Quinlan
See, e. g., NonResident Taxpayers Association v. Murray, 347 F.Supp. 399 (E.D.Pa.1972) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 410 U. S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1356 , 35 L.Ed.2d 581 (1973) (challenge to Pennsylvania statute governing issuance of a writ of capias ad respondendum); Desmond v. Hachey, 315 F.Supp. 328 (D.Me.1970) (declaring unconstitutional a Maine law which permitted the arrest and incarceration, without hearing, of a judgment debtor who had failed to obey a disclosure subpoena); Otton v. Zaborac, 525 P.2d 537 (Alaska Sup.Ct.1974) (right of indigent faced with adjudication of civil contempt i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vail v. Quinlan
See, e. g., Non-Resident Taxpayers Association v. Murray, 347 F.Supp. 399 (E.D.Pa.1972) (three-judge court), aff'd mem., 410 U. S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1356 , 35 L.Ed.2d 581 (1973) (challenge to Pennsylvania statute governing issuance of a writ of capias ad respondendum ); Desmond v. Hachey, 315 F.Supp. 328 (D.Me.1970) (declaring unconstitutional a Maine law which permitted the arrest and incarceration, without hearing, of a judgment *636 debtor who had failed to obey a disclosure subpoena); Otton v. Zaborac, 525 P.2d 537 (Alaska Sup.Ct.1974) (right of indigent faced with adjudication of civil conte…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Business MacHines Corporation v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation, and Cravath, Swaine & Moore v. United States of America, International Business MacHines Corporation v. David N. Edelstein, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southerndistrict of New York, and United States of America
See, e.g., Nader v. United States, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973). 10 28 We dismiss the appeal and deny the petition for mandamus.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
See, e. g., Nader v. United States, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973) . 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States
See, e. g., Nader v. United States, 410 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 582 (1973). 10 We dismiss the appeal and deny the petition for mandamus. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barr et ux
v.
Thorp Credit, Inc.
v.
Thorp Credit, Inc.
No. 72-5851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 6, 1973.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Iowa. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.