Gullo v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 821 (1973). · Go Syfert
Gullo v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 821 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark Equipment Co. v. Lift Parts Manufacturing Co. (ca7, 1992-08-14) · Strongest negative: David A. Clarke v. United States (cadc, 1990-10-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" David A. Clarke v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1990 · signal: but see · confidence high
See also Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Regan, 727 F.2d 1161 (D.C.Cir.1984); but see Board of Regents v. New Left Project, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973) (vacating without explanation, 472 F.2d 218 (5th Cir.1973), and remanding to district court for vacatur of its judgment; the court of appeals had refused to vacate district court judgment on Garde-like grounds). 40 Some commentators have argued that courts can better address these concerns in determining whether the voluntary cessation of conduct by the defendant has caused the case to become moot in the firs…
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Aqui (2×)
N.M. · 1986 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Pruett v. Texas, 468 F.2d 51 (5th Cir.1972), aff'd in part, modified in part, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir.1973), affd without opinion, 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973) (equal protection violation where convicted felon denied good time credits for confinement pending appeal); White v. Gilligan, 351 F.Supp. 1012 (S.D.Ohio) (decided prior to McGinnis)', People v. Sage, 26 Cal.3d 498 , 165 Cal.Rptr. 280 , 611 P.2d 874 (1980) (equal protection violation where detainee/misdemeanant eligible for presentence good time credits but detainee/felon is not; strict scrutiny standard of …
discussed Cited "see" Clark Equipment Co. v. Lift Parts Manufacturing Co.
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
Lake Coal Co. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co., 474 U.S. 120 , 106 S.Ct. 553 , 88 L.Ed.2d 418 (1985) (case settled while certio-rari pending; district court instructed to dismiss case as moot); City Gas Co. v. Consolidated Gas Co., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1300 , 113 L.Ed.2d 235 (1991) (same, procedural posture of case recited in Joint Motion to Grant Certiorari, Vacate Judgment of Court of Appeals and Remand with Directions to Vacate Judgment of District Court on Grounds of Mootness (Feb. 27, 1991), filed in the cited case); see abo Board of Regents v. New Left Education Project, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct…
discussed Cited "see" Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Division 757 v. Lane County Mass Transit District
Or. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. New Left Education Project, 414 US 807 , 94 S Ct 118 , 38 L Ed 2d 43 (1973), vacating and remanding, 472 F2d 218 (1973); United States v. Munsingwear, 340 US 36 , 71 S Ct 104 , 95 L Ed 36 (1950); 13 C.
cited Cited "see" Joe Hogan v. Mississippi University for Women
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Left Education Project v. Board of Regents, 472 F.2d 218, 220-221 (5th Cir.), vacated, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Garden State Bar Association v. Middlesex County Ethics Committee
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Hall v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45, 48 , 90 S.Ct. 200, 201 , 24 L.Ed.2d 214 (1969); see New Left Education Project v. Board of Regents of the University of Texas System, 472 F.2d 218 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded as moot, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Garden State Bar Ass'n v. Middlesex County Ethics Committee
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Hall v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45, 48 , 90 S.Ct. 200, 201 , 24 L.Ed.2d 214 (1969); see New Left Education Project v. Board of Regents of the University of Texas System, 472 F.2d 218 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded as moot, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Ex Parte Allen
Tex. Crim. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pruett v. State of Texas, 468 F.2d 51 , aff’d en banc, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir. 1973), aff’d in 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973); Gardner v. State, supra. For the reasons stated, petitioner is entitled to “flat time” credit and “good time” credit consideration for time spent in jail pending his appeal from May 18, 1971, until July 3, 1973, and from June 26, 1974, until the present.
cited Cited "see" Gardner v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pruett v. State of Texas, 468 F.2d 51 , aff’d en banc, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir. 1973), aff’d in 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973); Art. 42.03, Sec. 4, Y.A.C.C.P.
cited Cited "see" Ex Parte Bates
Tex. Crim. App. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pruett v. Texas, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir. 1973) affirmed in 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lebo v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
This procedure "impedefs] open and equal access to appellate review since it may deter a defendant from appealing. ...” Id. at 799 ; see also Pruett v. Texas, 468 F.2d 51 (5th Cir.1972), aff'd and modified in part, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir.1973), aff'd, 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973) (holding that *329 a defendant must be granted accumulated good time acquired while an appeal is pending and noting that "penalizing those who choose to exercise constitutional rights ‘would be patently unconstitutional’....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Beck
Tex. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Due process requires that a state, once it establishes avenues of appellate review, must keep those avenues free of unreasoned distinctions that impede open and equal access to the courts.” See Robinson v. Beto, 426 F.2d 797, 798 (5 th Cir.1970) (no credit for good time served while appeal pending violates due process); see also Pruett v. Texas, 468 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir.1972) (failure to give credit for good time acquired pending appeal violates equal protection), aff'd. in part and modified in part, 470 F.2d 1182 (5 th Cir.) (en banc), aff'd, 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clark Equipment Company v. Lift Parts Manufacturing Company Incorporated
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Lake Coal Co. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co., 474 U.S. 120 , 106 S.Ct. 553 , 88 L.Ed.2d 418 (1985) (case settled while certiorari pending; district court instructed to dismiss case as moot); City Gas Co. v. Consolidated Gas Co., --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1300 , 113 L.Ed.2d 235 (1991) (same, procedural posture of case recited in Joint Motion to Grant Certiorari, Vacate Judgment of Court of Appeals and Remand with Directions to Vacate Judgment of District Court on Grounds of Mootness (Feb. 27, 1991), filed in the cited case); see also Board of Regents v. New Left Education Project, 414 U.S. 807 , 94 S…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte Iglehart
Tex. Crim. App. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare also Pruett v. Texas, 470 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir. 1973), affirmed in 414 U.S. 802 , 94 S.Ct. 118 , 38 L.Ed.2d 39 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gullo
v.
Robinson, U. S. District Judge
No. 72-1486.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 821
Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.