Gen. Elec. Co. v. Local 783, Allied Indus. Workers, 414 U.S. 822 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Local 783, Allied Indus. Workers, 414 U.S. 822 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1985 · …by 'lowering their sights' and accepting what might have been the best job available, the claimants were doing all that could reasonably be expected of them by way of mitigation ⚠ not in text
61 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Wellman Thermal Systems Corp. (insd, 1988-04-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Williams v. Wellman Thermal Systems Corp.
S.D. Ind. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
after a finding of ambiguity has been made, 'ejvidence of the surrounding circumstances and the practical construction of the parties is admissible to aid in its interpretation.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1232, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,166 Michaele Cowart Nord, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant v. United States Steel Corporation, Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
by 'lowering their sights' and accepting what might have been the best job available, the claimants were doing all that could reasonably be expected of them by way of mitigation
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Nord v. United States Steel Corp.
11th Cir. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
by 'lowering their sights' and accepting what might have been the best job available, the claimants were doing all that could reasonably be expected of them by way of mitigation
discussed Cited "see" Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (holding the “requirement that the amendment be filed by a specified date or that the party amending bear a portion of the additional cost to the opposing party would, in proper circumstances, be reasonable conditions.”); see also Anderberg v. Masonite Corp., 176 F.R.D. 682, 687 (N.D.Ga.1997) (“the court may under Rule 15(a), impose costs as a condition of granting leave to amend in order to compensate Defendant and avoid any prejudice caused by the amendment.”); Gen.
cited Cited "see" Local 1574, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.
D. Me. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Local 783, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. General Electric Co., 471 F.2d 751, 756-58 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 822 , 94 S.Ct. 120 , 38 L.Ed.2d 55 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Firchau v. Diamond Nat’l Corp., 345 F.2d 269 , 275 (9th Cir.1965); see also Local 788, Allied Industrial Workers of America v. General Electric Co., 471 F.2d 751, 756 (6th Cir.) (stating that costs may be imposed as condition of leave to amend to avoid prejudice to the opposing party), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 822 , 94 S.Ct. 120 , 38 L.Ed.2d 55 (1973); Cemar, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 678 F.Supp. 1091, 1106 (D.Del.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Electric Co.
v.
Local 783, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO
No. 72-1500.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
414 U.S. 822
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · S.D. Indiana (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.