discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe v. Martin (2×) See also American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1041 (D.D.C.1973) (3-judge court), 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), vacated, sub nom Staats v. ACLU, 422 U.S. 1030 , 95 S.Ct. 2646 , 45 L.Ed.2d 686 (1975); United States v. Finance Committee to Reelect the President, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 507 F.2d 1194, 1200-02 (1974). .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Citizens Committee To Save Wefm v. Federal Communications Commission Compare note 56 infra. I have recently struggled with the difficult constitutional problems in this area, see American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1051 (D.D.C.1973), prob. juris. noted sub nom., Staats v. American Civil Liberties Union, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), and have noted the recent guilty pleas entered by individuals and corporations for conduct which on its face at least seems within First Amendment protection.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Citizens Committee to Save WEFM v. Federal Communications Commission Compare note 56 infra. I have recently struggled with the difficult constitutional problems in this area, see American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F.Supp. 1051 (D.D.C.1973), prob. juris. noted sub nom., Staats v. American Civil Liberties Union, 417 U.S. 944 , 94 S.Ct. 3066 , 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974), and have noted the recent guilty pleas entered by individuals and corporations for conduct which on its face at least seems within First Amendment protection.