green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Portland v. DePaolo
See Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement Commission et al., 307 A.2d 1, 28 (Me.), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1035 , 94 S.Ct. 532 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973); Farnsworth v. Whiting, 106 Me. 430 , 76 A. 909 (1910); Kennebec Water District v. Waterville, 96 Me. 234, 246-251 , 52 A. 774, 779-781 (1902).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Wood Preservers, Inc. v. Commonwealth Department of Environmental Resources
(2×)
See Portland Pipe Line v. Environmental Improvement Commission, 414 U.S. 1035 , 94 S.Ct. 532 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 , dismissing appeal for want of a substantial federal question, 307 A.2d 1 (Me.1973) (state statute imposing vicarious liability upon oil terminal operators for oil spills caused by independent carriers who were destined for the operators’ terminals, but over whom the operators had no control, held to be valid exercise of police power); United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 589 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1978) (Coast Guard constitutionally imposed liability under Federal Water Pollution …
discussed
Cited "see"
Steuart Transportation Company v. Allied Towing Corporation, in Personam, and Its Tug Falcon, in Rem, Commonwealth of Virginia (State Water Control Board), United States of America, Amoco Oil Company, and Winfred E. Sutton, Sr., Steuart Transportation Company v. United States of America, Allied Towing Corporation, in Personam, and Its Tug Falcon, in Rem, Commonwealth of Virginia (State Water Control Board), Amoco Oil Company, and Winfred E. Sutton
Accord, Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement Commission, 307 A.2d 1, 44-45 (Me.), Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 414 U.S. 1035 , 94 S.Ct. 532 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973). 38 In 33 U.S.C. § 1321 (O )(2), Congress expressly disclaimed any intention to preempt the states "from imposing any requirement or liability with respect to the discharge of oil." Congress recognized the states' primary responsibility to eliminate pollution, and it directed the President to prepare a national contingency plan for the removal of oil spills that would coordinate the ef…
discussed
Cited "see"
Steuart Transportation Co. v. Allied Towing Corp.
Accord, Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement Commission, 307 A.2d 1, 44-45 (Me.), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 414 U.S. 1035 , 94 S.Ct. 532 , 38 L.Ed.2d 326 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Portland Pipe Line Corp.
v.
Environmental Improvement Commission and American Oil Co. v. Environmental Improvement Commission
v.
Environmental Improvement Commission and American Oil Co. v. Environmental Improvement Commission
No. 73-382; No. 73-383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 19, 1973.
Consideration, These, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Appeals from Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss appeals for want of properly presented federal question.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.Reported below: 307 A. 2d 1.