green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Coates v. United States
But see Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 168 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974) (trial judge did not abuse discretion in excluding, as impermissibly speculative, expert medical testimony with respect to the effect of the ingestion of one tablet of Desoxyn, a weight control drug, on a witness’ ability to see); Durant v. United States, supra, 551 A.2d at 1328 (presence of PCP in defendant's urine held improperly admitted for purpose of calling into question defendant's ability to perceive and recall events of that date; court observed that "expert te…
cited
Cited "see"
Teoume-Lessane v. United States
See (Raymond L.) Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 167 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erdheim v. Greiner
See Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307, 316-17 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 L.Ed.2d 344 (1985). 46 . 495 F.2d 683, 690 (2d Cir.) (citing Steckler v. United States, 7 F.2d 59 (2d Cir.1925) (L.Hand, J.) and Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390 , 52 S.Ct. 189 , 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932) (Holmes, J.)), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974). 47 . 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 48 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Khan
See United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683, 696-97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 43,201, 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 201 United States of America v. Jamshaid Khan Charles Addo Yobo Audrey Cecile Sadaphal Nephtali Montfort and Parnell St. Louis, Mohammed Sohail Khan Jacqueline Otero Deborah Williams Rosaly Saba Khalil Lancaster Lo and Gilbert Ross
See United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683, 696-97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. United States
(2×)
See Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 167 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974). [13] The government's evidence showed, in part, that after Allen and the decedent left Annie Johnson's apartment, a gunshot was heard.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. United States
We find no abuse of discretion because we are satisfied that the conflict between the co-defendants’ defenses was not of a magnitude to raise a danger that the jury would convict appellant based on this conflict alone, Tillman, supra, 519 A.2d at 170 , Ready, supra, 445 A.2d at 987 ; West v. United States, 499 A.2d 860, 867-69 (D.C.1985); see Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 166 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coreas v. United States
(2×)
See Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 167 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Killebrew
See, for example, United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683 (2d Cir.), cert. den. 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974); United States v. McGhee, 488 F.2d 781 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 417 U.S. 971 , 94 S.Ct. 3176 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1142 (1974); United States v. White, 482 F.2d 485 (4th Cir.1973), cert. den. 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1471 , 39 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974); United States v. Furtney, 454 F.2d 1 (3d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. L. D. Morris, United States of America v. Lawrence Lee Jelsma, United States of America v. Randall Lloyd Keef, United States of America v. Jana Jarvis
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Amos v. United States, 496 F.2d 1269, 1271-72 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 140 ; Cook v. United States, 379 F.2d 966, 970 (5th Cir.); See United States v. McCoy, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 60, 63 , 429 F.2d 739, 742 (D.C.Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Amos v. United States, 496 F.2d 1269, 1271-72 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 140 ; Cook v. United States, 379 F.2d 966, 970 (5th Cir.); see United States v. McCoy, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 60, 63 , 429 F.2d 739, 742 (D.C.Cir.).
cited
Cited "see"
Nowlin v. United States
See Smith v. United States, D.C.App., 315 A.2d 163, 168, cert. denied, Jefferies v. U. S., 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Malizia
See United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683, 691 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974); Sealfon v. United States, 332 U.S. 575, 578-79 , 68 S.Ct. 70 , 92 L.Ed. 341 (1948); United States v. Kramer, supra; United States v. Tramunti, 500 F.2d 1334, 1336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1079 , 95 S.Ct. 667 , 42 L.Ed.2d 673 (1974) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hiland
We consider it significant that defense counsel did not object to the supplemental charge. 41 “[S]uch an omis sion indicates that the potential for coercion argued now was not apparent to one on the spot.” Lowenfield, 484 U.S. at 240 , 108 S.Ct. at 552 ; see also Amos v. United States, 496 F.2d 1269, 1273 (8th Cir.) (lack of objection by defense counsel to court’s procedures in polling jury and directing jury to resume deliberations “permits an inference that the procedures utilized did not appear coercive at the time”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 140 (197…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry K. Hiland, United States of America v. Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., Now Known as Retrac, Inc., United States of America v. Ronald M. Carter, Sr.
We consider it significant that defense counsel did not object to the supplemental charge. 41 "[S]uch an omission indicates that the potential for coercion argued now was not apparent to one on the spot." Lowenfield, 484 U.S. at 240 , 108 S.Ct. at 552 ; see also Amos v. United States, 496 F.2d 1269, 1273 (8th Cir.) (lack of objection by defense counsel to court's procedures in polling jury and directing jury to resume deliberations "permits an inference that the procedures utilized did not appear coercive at the time"), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 140 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Sarisky
See, e.g., Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 167 (D.C.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Singley v. United States
(2×)
There is, then, at least some reason to believe that Mosley would have testified that Singley only agreed to introduce him to a dealer or that Singley never actually touched the cocaine. [7] Harris v. United States, 430 A.2d 536, 542 (D.C. 1981); see also ( Raymond) Smith v. United States, 315 A.2d 163, 168 (D.C.1974) (whether absence of witness has been "satisfactorily explained"), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974); German, supra, 525 A.2d at 611 ("reasonable, good faith efforts" to locate the witness). [8] Singley's contention that the Park Police lacked terri…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scott Edward Meyers
See, e. g., United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 .(1974), and cases cited therein at 690.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aronoff
See, e. g., United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Philip Lubrano
See, e. g., United States v. Zane, 495 F.2d 683 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 174 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974), and cases cited therein at 690.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First Presbyterian Church of Forest Park
v.
Lowe
v.
Lowe
No. 73-1922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1974.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.