green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Gail S. Huecker, Cross-Appellees v. Elizabeth Milburn, and Marian Weisenberger, Cross-Appellants
(4×)
See also Taylor v. Perini, 503 F.2d 899, 901 (6th Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 982 , 95 S.Ct. 1985 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975). 5 This Court has found no meaningful distinction between an award of attorneys’ fees and an award of damages for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment, where the award is for “a past breach of legal duty” by state officials which “must be paid from public funds in the state treasury . . .” Jordon v. Gilligan, supra at 709-10 , quoting Edelman v. Jordan, supra, 415 U.S. at 663, 668 , 94 S.Ct. 1347 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. United States
(2×)
See also Snead v. Dept. of Social Services of City of New York, 355 F.Supp. 764, 772 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (3-judge court), vacated 416 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 2376 , 40 L.Ed.2d 755 (1974), reaff'd 389 F.Supp. 935 (1974), vacated for consideration of mootness, 421 U.S. 982 , 95 S.Ct. 1985 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vijay v. Satoskar, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Indiana Real Estate Commission
(2×)
Compare Jordon v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1996 , 44 L.Ed.2d 481 (1975), with Milburn v. Huecker, 500 F.2d 1279, 1282 (6th Cir. 1974), and see Taylor v. Perini, 503 F.2d 899, 911-912 (6th Cir. 1974), vacated and remanded in light of Alyeska Pipeline, 421 U.S. 982 , 95 S.Ct. 1985 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975); see also Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Brinegar, 494 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1997 , 44 L.Ed.2d 481 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
E. F. Johnson Co.
v.
Commissioner of Taxation
v.
Commissioner of Taxation
No. 74-1258.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
May 27, 1975.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Minn, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decisior of this appeal.