green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
“numerous eases hold that employee turnover, standing alone, does not give rise to good faith doubts regarding a union's majority status.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Aaron Henry v. First National Bank of Clarksdale v. Mississippi Action for Progress, Inc.
But see Brown v. Georgia Power Co., S.D.Ga., 1973, 371 F.Supp. 543 , afFd, 5 Cir., 1974, 491 F.2d 117 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974). 2 . 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides: § 1983.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
May Department Stores Company v. National Labor Relations Board
numerous cases hold that employee turnover, standing alone, does not give rise to good faith doubts regarding a union's majority status.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
numerous eases hold that employee turnover, standing alone, does not give rise to good faith doubts regarding a union's majority status.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gochman v. Oakley
(2×)
See Jackson Court Condominiums, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 874 F.2d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir. 1989), citing South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5,7 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied. 95 S.Ct. 66 (1974).7 The 7 Although Jackson Court footnotes a caveat as to whether the exemption from procedural due process is a “flat rule,” Id. at 1074 n.3, this court’s en banc decision in Shelton v. City of 6 Gochmans’ state law arguments for quasi-judicial characterization are unpersuasive in light of our uniform caselaw to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see"
County Line Joint Venture v. The City of Grand Prairie, Texas
See Developments, supra. As a preliminary matter to resolving whether the city council acted in an administrative or legislative capacity in enacting the ordinance, we review this court’s decisions in South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 1625 , 40 L.Ed.2d 119 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Couf v. DeBlaker, 652 F.2d 585 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); and Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied…
cited
Cited "see"
Abraham v. City of Mandeville
See South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Premium Foods, Incorporated, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And
(2×)
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d, 1131, 1142 (7th Cir.) (change in employer from national grocery chain to individual supermarket unlikely to significantly affect employee attitudes), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cloutier v. Town of Epping
See South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974) (“[Ljocal zoning is a quasi-legislative function, not subject to federal judicial consideration in the absence of arbitrary action.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thompson
See Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir. 1974) (holding unconstitutional an absolute ban on leafletting in welfare offices where such leafletting had been permitted previously), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thompson
See Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir. 1974) (holding unconstitutional an absolute ban on leafletting in welfare offices where such leafletting had been permitted previously), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Roger's
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Zim's Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 495 F.2d 1131, 1139 , cert. den. 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Roger's I.G.A., Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 495 F.2d 1131, 1139 , cert. den. 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 .
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
As the Board explained: “In these circumstances, the alleged change[s] ... are insufficient to outweigh the overwhelming evidence — and indeed the concession — that [the Company] took over the Westinghouse plants with no significant change in the employing industry.” Id. at 674; see Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1141 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1976) (successor’s change to localized management “not of such magnitude as to be given controlling effect”); NLRB v. Interstate 65 Corp., 453 F.2d 269, 274 (6th Cir. 1971) (same)…
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl- Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, White-Westinghouse Corp., Intervenor. White-Westinghouse Corporation, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Etc., Intervenor
As the Board explained: "In these circumstances, the alleged change(s) . . . are insufficient to outweigh the overwhelming evidence and indeed the concession that (the Company) took over the Westinghouse plants with no significant change in the employing industry." Id. at 674; See Zim's Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1141 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1976) (successor's change to localized management "not of such magnitude as to be given controlling effect"); NLRB v. Interstate 65 Corp., 453 F.2d 269, 274 (6th Cir. 1971) (same). 13 White-Westing…
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Alvin J. Bart and Co., Inc.
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1140 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. J. S. Alberici Construction Company, Inc.
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1144 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Lakeside Community Hospital v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
See South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir. 1974) (en banc), cert. denied 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles E. Studen v. Robert S. Beebe
See, South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 6-7 (5th Cir. en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc.
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1140 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pat Wright and Jack Lieberman v. Chief of Transit Police, and Chairman and Members of the Board of the New York City Transit Authority
(2×)
See Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Wolin v. Port of New York Authori ty, supra. We recognize that the problems and characteristics of the subway system are certainly different from those of the Bus Terminal building of the Port Authority in Wolin, supra, and the Albany Welfare Center in Wyman, supra, but we cannot assume that promulgation and enforcement of reasonable regulations is impractical without appropriate findings from the district court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dynamic MacHine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Zims Foodliner v. N.L.R.B., 495 F.2d 1131, 1138-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974); N.L.R.B. v. Bachrodt Chevrolet Co., 468 F.2d 963, 967-68 (7th Cir. 1972), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 411 U.S. 912 , 93 S.Ct. 1547 , 36 L.Ed.2d 304 (1973); N.L.R.B. v. Band-Age Inc., 534 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 921 , 97 S.Ct. 318 , 50 L.Ed.2d 288 (1976); N.L.R.B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, 465 F.2d 1039, 1043 (6th Cir. 1972); N.L.R.B. v. Denham, 469 F.2d 239, 244 (9th Cir. 1972), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 411 U.S. …
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Boston Needham Industrial Cleaning Co., Inc.
See Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Families Achieving Independence And Respect v. Nebraska Department Of Social Services
The Supreme Court recently observed that "handing out leaflets in the advocacy of a politically controversial viewpoint [ ] is the essence of First Amendment expression." McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334, 346-48 , 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1519 , 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995); see also Albany Welfare Rights Org. v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974) (a blanket denial to welfare rights organization requesting to hand out leaflets at welfare office violates the First Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Families Achieving Independence & Respect v. Nebraska Department of Social Services
The Supreme Court recently observed that “handing out leaflets in the advocacy of a politically controversial viewpoint [] is the essence of First Amendment expression.” McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 346-48 , 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1519 , 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995); see also Albany Welfare Rights Org. v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974) (a blanket denial to welfare rights organization requesting to hand out leaflets at welfare office violates the First Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Families Achieving Independence And Respect v. Nebraska Department Of Social Services
The Supreme Court recently observed that "handing out leaflets in the advocacy of a politically controversial viewpoint [ ] is the essence of First Amendment expression." McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334 , ----, 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1519 , 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995); see also Albany Welfare Rights Org. v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974) (holding that a blanket denial to welfare rights organization requesting to hand out leaflets at welfare office violated First Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Families Achieving Independence & Respect v. Nebraska Department of Social Services
The Supreme Court recently observed that “handing out leaflets in the advocacy of a politically controversial viewpoint [] is the essence of First Amendment expression.” McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1519 , 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995); see also Albany Welfare Rights Org. v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974) (holding that a blanket denial to welfare rights organization requesting to hand out leaflets at welfare office violated First Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. City of Edgewood
Greenbriar, 881 F.2d at 1579 ; Spence, 873 F.2d at 258 ; DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, 706 F.Supp. 1479, 1499 (M.D.Fla.), aff'd, 888 F.2d 766 (11th Cir.1989); see also South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred B. Shelton Iii, and John Paul Jones, Cross v. City of College Station, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
Compare South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Burns v. City of Des Peres, 534 F.2d 103 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 861 , 97 S.Ct. 164 , 50 L.Ed.2d 139 (1976); and Lakeside Community Hosp. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 461 F.Supp. 1150, 1155-56 (D.Nev.1978), all basing their rejection of claims of arbitrary denials of rezoning on the zoning authority's articulation of reasons for its decision, with Shenk v. Zoning Comm'n, 440 F.2d 295 (D.C.Cir.1971); and Scott v. Greenville County, 716 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prisoners Union v. Department of Corrections
(Id., at pp. 90-91; see also Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman (2d Cir. 1974) 493 F.2d 1319, 1323 , cert. den., 419 U.S. 838 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 64 , 95 S.Ct. 66 ] [urging welfare reform in the lobby of a welfare office].) Where the relevant audience is found only in a particular place, it has been suggested that “[t]he bare possibility of alternative ways to communicate the same message should not suffice to defeat the first amendment claim.” (Tribe, American Constitutional Law, supra, at p. 692.) Finally, even where alternative methods of communication are found to exist, and the regu…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Deerfield Medical Center, Medallion Executive Consultants, Inc. v. City of Deerfield Beach, City Commission of Deerfield Beach
See, e. g., Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 837 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Boeing Company, Intervenor
See also Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 1131, 1142-1144 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education Members
Compare Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319, 1323 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Friedman v. Union Free School District, supra; Los Angeles Teachers Union v. Los Angeles City Board of Education, supra. As we discuss 'infra, such alternative means are available to these appellants.) Here, the school mailboxes, bulletin boards, and meeting rooms which appellants seek to use for First Amendment speech and associational activities are not public fora.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education Members
Compare Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319, 1323 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (1974); Friedman v. Union Free School District, supra; Los Angeles Teachers Union v. Los Angeles City Board of Education, supra. As we discuss infra, such alternative means are available to these appellants.) 16 Here, the school mailboxes, bulletin boards, and meeting rooms which appellants seek to use for First Amendment speech and associational activities are not public fora.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhoads v. Mcferran
See, e. g., Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (Oct. 15, 1974); James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972); Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 392 F.2d 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 940 , 89 S.Ct. 290 , 21 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968). 6 The latter two factual issues are not mentioned in the 9(g) statements at all.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhoads v. McFerran
See, e. g., Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 64 (Oct. 15, 1974); James v. Board of Education, 461 F.2d 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1042 , 93 S.Ct. 529 , 34 L.Ed.2d 491 (1972); Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 392 F.2d 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 940 , 89 S.Ct. 290 , 21 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orion Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Brooks v. N.L.R.B., 348 U.S. 96, 98 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); see, e. g., Zim’s Foodliner, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 495 F.2d 1131, 1139 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 66 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown.
v.
Georgia Power Co.
v.
Georgia Power Co.
No. 73-1864.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.