green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
William H. Sullivan II v. National Football League, & Members of the National Football League
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); McDaniel v. General Motors Corp., 480 F.Supp. 666 (E.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Comfort Trane Air Conditioning Company v. The Trane Company, the Trane Company, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Comfort Trane Air Conditioning Company, Comfort Trane Service Company, Inc., Haswell Enterprises, Ltd. And Home Center Corporation, Third-Party Defendants-Cross-Appellees
Accord, Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); Shumate & Co. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 509 F.2d 147, 153 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868 , 96 S.Ct. 131 , 46 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975). 69 Even prior to establishing causation, plaintiffs could recover damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act only if they could prove the existence of a conspiracy to restrain trade in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Comfort Trane Air Conditioning Co. v. Trane Co.
Accord, Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); Shumate & Co. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 509 F.2d 147, 153 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868 , 96 S.Ct. 131 , 46 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Glazer
See Schoonover v. State, 218 Kan. 377 , 543 P.2d 881 , cert. den. 424 U.S. 944 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 5 Cir. 1975, 514 F.2d 690 , cert. denied, 1976, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 ; see also Cinema-Tex Enterprises, Inc. v. Santikos Theaters, Inc., 5 Cir. 1976, 535 F.2d 932 , aff’g 414 F.Supp. 640 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Yoder Brothers, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Crossappellants. California-Florida Plant Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Crossappellants v. Yoder Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross
See Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 5 Cir. 1975, 514 F.2d 690 , cert. denied, 1976, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 ; see also Cinema-Tex Enterprises, Inc. v. Santikos Theaters, Inc., 5 Cir. 1976, 535 F.2d 932 (1976), aff'g, 414 F.Supp. 640 . 113 In a similar situation, this Court said in Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., supra, 514 F.2d at 695 : 114 If the jury calculated any part of its damage award on the (impermissibly speculative) sum of Falstaff's price increases to Kestenbaum, it was error.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rainbow Travel Service, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corporation
See also Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 698 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 ("The wrongdoer may not complain of inexactness where his actions preclude precise computation to the extent of the injury.") B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rainbow Travel Service, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
See also Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 698 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (“The wrongdoer may not complain of inexactness where his actions preclude precise computation to the extent of the injury.”) B.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 695 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976), II P. Areeda & D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Baltimore Football Club, Inc. (Baltimore Colts), Buffalo Bills, Inc., Chargers Football Co. (San Diego Chargers), Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc., Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc., Detroit Lions, Inc., Five Smiths, Inc. (Atlanta Falcons), Green Bay Packers, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc., New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., New Orleans Saints Louisiana Partnership, New York Football Giants, New York Jets Football Club, Inc., Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc., Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., Pro-Football, Inc. (Washington Redskins), Efk Sports, Ltd., Sued Herein as Rocky Mountain Empire Sports, Inc. (Denver Broncos), St. Louis Football Cardinals Co., San Francisco Forty-Niners, Seattle Professional Football (Seattle Seahawks), and Tampa Bay Area Nfl Football, Inc. (Tampa Bay Buccaneers), Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross Claimant-Appellee v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Cross
See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 695 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976), II P. Areeda & D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See also Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690 (5th Cir.1975) (no injury from price fixing scheme where plaintiff conceded he would have voluntarily taken action which defendant sought to coerce, and where plaintiff failed to introduce any evidence of reduction in sales), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See also Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690 (5th Cir.1975) (no injury from price fixing scheme where plaintiff conceded he would have voluntarily taken action which defendant sought to coerce, and where plaintiff failed to introduce any evidence of reduction in sales), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976). 61 In particular, CAT's receipts demonstrate a clear decrease in revenues subsequent to its termination by Basic at the behest of FRI.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern Dental Corp. v. Isaac Masel Co., Inc.
See, e. g., Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F.2d 690, 698 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1412 , 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing Company, 498 F.2d 1240, 1244-45 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied sub nom., Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wood, 420 U.S. 992 , 95 S.Ct. 1427 , 43 L.Ed.2d 673 (1975); Albrect v. Herald Company, 452 F.2d 124 , 129 (8th Cir. 1971) mandamus denied, 405 U.S. 1063 , 92 S.Ct. 1493 , 31 L.Ed.2d 810 (1972); Simpson v. Union Oil Company of California, 411 F.2d 897, 909 (9th Cir.), reversed on other grounds, 396 U.S. 13 , 90 S.Ct. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kestenbaum
v.
Falstaff Brewing Corp.
v.
Falstaff Brewing Corp.
No. 75-987.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1976.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.