green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
8.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 · 2 courts ·
…a substantial factor in determining the fairness of a settlement is the opinion of counsel involved in the settlement.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1982 ·
…appellants do not argue, nor may they under the authorities, that the assent of the class plaintiffs is essential to the settlement, provided the trial court finds it fair and reasonable.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation
a substantial factor in determining the fairness of a settlement is the opinion of counsel involved in the settlement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Findley v. Falise
a substantial factor in determining the fairness of a settlement is the opinion of counsel involved in the settlement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.
appellants do not argue, nor may they under the authorities, that the assent of the class plaintiffs is essential to the settlement, provided the trial court finds it fair and reasonable
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can Company
wjhile the opinion and recommendation of experienced counsel is not to be blindly followed by the trial court, such opinion should be given weight in evaluating the proposed settlement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 788, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,441 Sarah Linda Parker, and Huey P. Mitchell v. Judith K. Anderson, and Bell Helicopter Company, Etc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
appellants do not argue, nor may they under the authorities, that the assent of the class plaintiffs is essential to the settlement, provided the trial court finds it fair and reasonable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Parker v. Anderson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
appellants do not argue, nor may they under the authorities, that the assent of the class plaintiffs is essential to the settlement, provided the trial court finds it fair and reasonable.
cited
Cited "see"
Kathryn A. Bailey v. Great Lakes Canning, Inc.
See Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1176 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Welsch v. Gardebring
See Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169 , 1173 cert. denied 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (4th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Art Materials Antitrust Litigation
Interest Campaign v. Fisher Foods ], 546 F.Supp. at 6 ; see Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 [ 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 ] (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Wicker Park Historic District Preservation Fund v. Pierce
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners’ Ass’n v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 229 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Alschuler v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Association v. Lynn, 372 F.Supp. 147, 150 (N.D.Ill.1973), aff’d, 524 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 42 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Alschuler v. Department Of Housing And Urban Development
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Association v. Lynn, 372 F.Supp. 147, 150 (N.D.Ill.1973), aff'd, 524 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 42 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Hope Community Ass'n v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Ass’n. v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1975) cert. denied 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 ; Harlem Valley Transportation Ass’n v. Stafford, 500 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Danilo Bautista Batimana and Jose Edgardo Noguera
(2×)
See United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609, 613-15 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Concord Township v. United States
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Ass’n v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 229-30 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); Hanly v. Kleindienst 471 F.2d 823, 829-30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 2290 , 36 L.Ed.2d 974 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills v. Costle
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Ass’n v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 229-30 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); Bosco v. Beck, 475 F.Supp. 1029 (D.N.J.1979) (Fisher, J.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Stearns Giese
(2×)
See United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976); United States v. Smith, 519 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Monarch Chemical Works, Inc. v. Exon
Accord, Nucleus of Chicago Homeowner’s Ass’n. v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 231 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
See Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); Bryan v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 494 F.2d 799, 803 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 900 , 95 S.Ct. 184 , 42 L.Ed.2d 146 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Sworob v. Harris
See Nucleus of Chicago Homeowners Assoc. v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225 , 231 & n. 4 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Armijo
The trial court “has wide discretion in supervising the order of proof in a conspiracy case.” United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1975); see United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Carolina National Bank v. Stone
See also Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); South Carolina Nat’l Bank v. Stone, 749 F.Supp. at 1423 ; In re Montgomery County Real Estate Antitrust Litig., 83 F.R.D. 305 (D.Md.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enterprise Energy Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Thompson, 124 F.R.D. at 159 ; see also Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); Bronson, 604 F.Supp. at 73 ; cf. Clark Equip.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John J. Murray
(2×)
See also United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609, 616-17 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976). 29 Bookmaking, the practice of taking bets on events that are commonly the focus of gambling, if accomplished on a more than occasional basis, is a gambling business.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Williams, Claddis Arrington, Mary Ferguson, A/K/A \Mary Davis\"
See United States v. Ramirez, 884 F.2d 1524 , 1530 n. 6 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609, 615-16 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenkins v. Massinga
See, e.g., Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173-74 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); In re Montgomery County Real Estate Antitrust Litigation, 83 F.R.D. 305, 315-16 (D.Md.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
See also, Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gant v. State
See also United States v. Tucker, 524 F.2d 77 (5th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 966 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976), and United States v. Ross, 503 F.2d 940 (5th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Porter v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Calaway, 524 F.2d 609, 615-616 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S. Ct. 1462 , 47 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aertsen v. Landrieu
Compare Nucleus of Chicago Home Owners Ass’n v. Lynn, 524 F.2d 225, 229-30 (7th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976), and Haniy v. Kleindienst, All F.2d 823, 828-30 (2d Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 412 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 2290 , 36 L.Ed.2d 974 (1973) (cases employed an “arbitrary and capricious” standard), with Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Butz, 498 F.2d 1314, 1320 (8th Cir. 1974) (en banc), and Wyoming Outdoor Coordinating Council v. Butz, 484 F.2d 1244 , 1248 49 (10th Cir. 1973), and Save Our Ten Acres v. Kreger, 472 F.2d 463, 466-6…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosenberg v. Jack Foley Realty, Inc.
See also Flinn v. FMC Corporation, 528 F.2d 1169, 1172-73 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967 , 96 S.Ct. 1462 , 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Draganescu
v.
First National Bank of Hollywood
v.
First National Bank of Hollywood
No. 75-949.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1976.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.