green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Saal v. Middendorf
See, Doe v. Commonwealth, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 , rehearing denied, 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 2192 , 48 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976), summarily affirming a three-judge court decision rejecting a constitutional attack on a Virginia statute making sodomy a crime, reported at 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975); and Cafeteria & Rest.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K.W. v. Holtzapple
Co., 123 F.R.D. 437 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (allowing plaintiff to sue insurance company anonymously to protect against identification as a homosexual); Doe v. Deschamps, 64 F.R.D. 652, 653 (D.Mont.1974) (permitting plaintiff in abortion suit to use pseudonym due to the personal nature of pregnancy); and (3) when the anonymous party is "compelled to admit [his or her] intention to engage in illegal conduct, thereby risking criminal prosecution," Stegall, 653 F.2d at 185 ; see also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975), judgment affd by 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.
Co., 123 F.R.D. 437 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (allowing plaintiff to sue insurance company anonymously to protect against identification as a homosexual); Doe v. Deschamps, 64 F.R.D. 652, 653 (D.Mont.1974) (permitting plaintiff in abortion suit to use pseudonym due to the personal nature of pregnancy); and (3) when the anonymous party is “compelled to admit [his or her] intention to engage in illegal conduct, thereby risking criminal prosecution,” Stegall, 653 F.2d at 185 ; see also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975), judgment affd. by 425 U.S. 985 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Langley
See also Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, 403 F.Supp. 1199 (3-judge court, E.D.Va.), aff’d, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 , reh. den. 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 2192 , 48 L.Ed.2d 810 ; Enslin v. Wallford, 565 F.2d 156 (4 Cir.), pet. cert. - S.Ct. -, 56 L.Ed.2d 413 (U.S.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howard
v.
Maggio, Warden
v.
Maggio, Warden
No. 75-6631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
Published
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.