green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Comacho v. Texas Workforce Commission
See Jones v. T.H., 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976) (affirming a three-judge district court’s holding that a Utah regulation was inconsistent with Title XIX because of an additional requirement for obtaining medical assistance); Carleson v. Remillard, 406 U.S. 598 , 92 S.Ct. 1932 , 32 L.Ed.2d 352 (1972) (invalidating a state law preventing children whose fathers were serving in the military from receiving AFDC benefits because Congress did not intend to exclude a class of benefit recipients).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parents United for Better Schools, Inc. v. School District of Philadelphia Board of Education
(2×)
See T.H. v. Jones, 425 F.Supp. 873 , 881 n. 5 (D.Utah 1975) (rejecting argument that state law granting minors right to consent to treatment for venereal disease implicitly disabled them from consenting to contraceptive services), aff'd on statutory grounds, 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Inc. v. Department of Health and Human Services
See Jones v. T.H., 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976), aff'g mem. only on statutory grounds sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Heckler
See Jones v. T.H., 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976), aff’g mem. only on statutory grounds sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Schweiker
See Jones v. T_H_, 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976); Doe v. Pickett, 480 F.Supp. 1218 (D.W.Va.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. Azar
See 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(y)(2)(B) ; 42 C.F.R. § 433.204 (a)(2) ; see also Jones v. T.H. , 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Search Warrant for 2045 Franklin, Denver
See also T.H. v. Jones, 425 F.Supp. 873 , (D.Utah 1975), aff'd in part, 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Early
See also T.H. v. Jones, 425 F.Supp. 873 , (D.Utah 1975), aff'd in part, 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Investigation
See also T-H- v. Jones, 425 F.Supp. 873, 877 (D.Utah 1975), aff’d in part, 425 U.S. 986 , 96 S.Ct. 2195 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones, Director, Division of Family Services of Utah
v.
T. H.
v.
T. H.
No. 75-624.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1976.
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Appeal from D. C. Utah. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis granted. Without indicating any views on whether the District Court’s decision on the constitutional issue was sound, judgment affirmed insofar as it invalidated the challenged regulation of the Utah Division of Family Services as inconsistent with the Social Security Act.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.