Sch. Dist. of Omaha v. United States, 423 U.S. 946 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Sch. Dist. of Omaha v. United States, 423 U.S. 946 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ. (ilnd, 1994-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ.
N.D. Ill. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School Dist. of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 540-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975); Oliver v. Michigan St.
cited Cited "see" Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School Dist. of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 540-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975); Oliver v. Michigan St.
cited Cited "see" Janice Adams and Jack Adams, Jr., Minors, by Jerrianne Adams, Their Natural Guardian and Next Friend, and Jerrianne Adams Catherine M. Neel and Camille A. Neel, Minors, by Catherine Neel, Their Natural Guardian and Next Friend, and Catherine Neel Mary Edington and Susan Edington, Minors, by Horace Edington, Their Natural Guardian and Next Friend, and Horace Edington, the Concerned Parents for Neighborhood Schools v. United States of America, Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, and Daniel L. Schlafly, Fredericke. Busse, Gordon L. Benson, Malcolm W. Martin, Mrs. Anita L. Bond, Mrs. Joycebowen, Henry M. Grich, Jr. (Secretary), Rev. James L. Cummings (President),mrs. Erma j.lawrence, Rev. Donald E. Mayer (Vice President), Lawrence Moser, Charlesharris, and Julius C. Dix, Benjamin M. Price, Robert W. Bernthal, David j.mahan, Charles Brasfield (School District Superintendents) and Robert E. Wentz(superintendent Ofschools), United States of America v. City of St. Louis, Janice Adams and Jack Adams, Jr., Minors, by Jerrianne Adams, Their Naturalguardian and Next Friend, and Jerrianne Adams Catherine M. Neel and Camille a.neel, Minors, by Catherine Neel, Their Natural Guardian and Next Friend, Andcatherineneel Mary Edington and Susan Edington, Minors, by Horace Edington, Theirnatural Guardian and Next Friend, and Horace Edington, the Concerned Parentsfor Neighborhood Schools, Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, and Daniel L. Schlafly, Fredericke. Busse, Gordon L. Benson, Malcolm W. Martin, Mrs. Anita L. Bond, Mrs. Joycebowen, Henry M. Grich, Jr. (Secretary), Rev. James L. Cummings (President),mrs. Erma j.lawrence, Rev. Donald E. Mayer (Vice President), Lawrence Moser, Charlesharris, and Julius C. Dix, Benjamin M. Price, Robert W. Bernthal, David j.mahan, Charles Brasfield (School District Superintendents) and Robert E. Wentz(superintendent Ofschools), Earline Caldwell, Lillie Caldwell, Denise Daniels, Dwane Daniels, Cedricwilliams, Stephanie Williams, Gloria Williams, Janis Hutcherson, Leehutcherson, Robert Smith, Eddie S. Willis and the National Association for Theadvancement of Coloredpeople v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis and Daniel L. Schlafly, Fredericke. Busse, Gordon L. Benson, Malcolm W. Martin, Mrs. Anita L. Bond, Mrs. Joycebowen, Henry M. Grich, Jr. (Secretary), Rev. James L. Cummings (President),mrs. Erma j.lawrence, Rev. Donald E. Mayer (Vice President), Lawrence Moser, Charlesharris, and Julius C. Dix, Benjamin M. Price, Robert W. Bernthal, David j.mahan, Charles Brasfield (School District Superintendents) and Robert E. Wentz(superintendent Ofschools) and the State of Missouri, Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the Stateof Missouri, the State of Missouri Board of Education, Craton Liddell, a Minor, by Minnie Liddell, His Mother and Next Friend, Andminnie Liddell, Joanna Goldsby, a Minor, by Barbara Goldsby, Her Mother Andnext Friend, and Barbara Goldsby, Deborah Yarber, a Minor, by Samuel Yarber, Her Father Andnext Friend, and Samuel Yarber, Nathalie Moore, a Minor, by Louise Moore, Hermother and Next Friend, and Louise Moore, Rachelle Legrand, a Minor, by Loislegrand, Her Mother and Next Friend, and Lois Legrand, on Behalf of Themselvesand All Otherschool-Age Children and Their Parents Residing in the Metropolitan Schooldistrict of the City of St. Louis, Missouri v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, and Daniel L. Schlafly, Fredericke. Busse, Gordon L. Benson, Malcolm W. Martin, Mrs. Anita L. Bond, Mrs. Joycebowen, Henry M. Grich, Jr. (Secretary), Rev. James L. Cummings (President),mrs. Erma j.lawrence, Rev. Donald E. Mayer (Vice President), Lawrence Moser, Charlesharris, and Julius C. Dix, Benjamin M. Price, Robert W. Bernthal, David j.mahan, Charles Brasfield (School District Superintendents) and Robert E. Wentz(superintendent Ofschools), and the State of Missouri, Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the Stateof Missouri, the State of Missouri Board of Education, City of St. Louis v. United States of America, Board of Education of the City of St. Louis and Daniel L. Schlafly, Fredericke. Busse, Gordon L. Benson, Malcolm W. Martin, Mrs. Anita L. Bond, Mrs. Joycebowen, Henry M. Grich, Jr. (Secretary), Rev. James L. Cummings (President),mrs. Erma j.lawrence, Rev. Donald E. Mayer (Vice President), Lawrence Moser, Charlesharris, and Julius C. Dix, Benjamin M. Price, Robert W. Bernthal, David j.mahan, Charles Brasfield (School District Superintendents) and Robert E. Wentz(superintendent Ofschools)
8th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 546-547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Adams v. United States
8th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 546-547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Vernille
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. *272 Mimms, 471 Pa. 546 , 555 n.1, 370 A.2d 1157 , 1161 n.1, rev’d and remanded on other grotmds, 434 U.S. 106 , 98 S.Ct. 330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977) (Nix, J., concurring and joined by O’Brien, J.) (citing with approval People v. Wolf, 60 Ill. 230 , 326 N.E.2d 766 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975), in which the court held that opening the door of a “suspicious” car to inspect the serial number was reasonable and not inconsistent with the fourth amendment on the ground that the intrusion was minimal).
cited Cited "see" Mark Brinkman v. John J. Gilligan
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 543-46 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Dedra Estell Overton, Intervenors-Appellants v. Texas Education Agency (Austin Independent School District)
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 8 Cir. 1975, 521 F.2d 530 , 538 n.13, cert. denied, 1975, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 ; Kelly v. Guinn, 9 Cir. 1972, 456 F.2d 100, 107 . 20 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. School District of Omaha
8th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. School District Of Omaha
8th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975). 2 Pursuant to this Court's remand, the District Court appointed a task force of Omaha Citizens to assist in developing a plan that would meet constitutional standards. 3 Thereafter, the School District submitted a plan to integrate the school system.
discussed Cited "see" Cunningham v. Grayson
6th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School Dist., 521 F.2d 530, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975) (maximum permissible percentage of blacks in individual school 35 percent in 20 percent black Omaha school system).
discussed Cited "see" Cynthia Cunningham and Richard N. Morgan v. Ernest Grayson and Jefferson County Board of Education, Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, L. J. Hollenbach, Iii, County Judge, Intervenor. John E. Haycraft v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, John E. Haycraft v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, Anchorage Independent School District and Elizabeth Ewing, Superintendent, Intervening
6th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School Dist., 521 F.2d 530, 547 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975) (maximum permissible percentage of blacks in individual school 35 percent in 20 percent black Omaha school system). 14 Admittedly, the plan requires that, of those black and white pupils to be bused, 4 black pupils be bused much more, eight or nine years, than white pupils, one or two years.
discussed Cited "see" Arthur v. Nyquist
W.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 537-38 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 [ 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 ], 44 U.S.L.W. 3280 (U.S. Nov. 11,1975), in which the court, faced with the same role model rationale, stated inter alia that such a belief — if truly held — reinforces rather than undercuts the presumption of segregative intent with respect to students, since it would logically suggest herding black students into their own schools where they could be taught by their proper black role models.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Interest of: M.W., a Minor
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Wolf , 60 Ill.2d 230 , 326 N.E.2d 766 , cert. denied , 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (Ill. 1975) (if an officer has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, his examination of a VIN, by opening a door is a reasonable search, if a search at all); Wood v. State , 632 S.W.2d 734 (Tex.Cr.App. 1982) (finding officer's act of opening a car door to view a VIN, when the officer is legitimately on the property where the car is parked, is not a search within the Fourth Amendment; and if it were a search, it would be a reasonable one). 3 Appellant also suggests that hi…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Middleton
Mo. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Beishir v. State, 522 S.W.2d 761, 765 (Mo. banc 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975); Williams, 858 S.W.2d at 801 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gahley v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Taylor, 513 F.2d 70, 72 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 281 (1975), holding that every Allen charge situation must be decided upon the particular facts and circumstances of the individual situation, thereby rejecting the proposition that a time deadline added to an Allen charge is reversible error in and of itself.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Anthony Reed, III v. James A. Rhodes (2×)
6th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 538-39 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 289 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jeanette Booker v. Special School District No. 1
8th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chavers, Indian Education, Failure For The Future?, 2 Am.Indian L.Rev. 61 (1974) 5 Cf. United States v. School Dist. of Omaha ("Omaha I"), 521 F.2d 530 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 40 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975), wherein we held that where public authorities, including school officials, take actions the natural, probable and foreseeable consequence of which is racial segregation, a rebuttable presumption arises that the actions in question were motivated by "segregative intent." As to the necessity for the establishment of "segregative intent" in discrimination cases…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reed v. Rhodes (2×)
N.D. Ohio · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. School District of Omaha, 521 F.2d 530, 538-39 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 361 , 46 L.Ed.2d 289 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
School District of Omaha
v.
United States
No. 75-270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1975.
423 U.S. 946
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.