green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
See Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 891 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977) (FOIA does not compel production of missing records).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. Eriksson
The withdrawal of an attorney in a given case is a "matter entrusted to the sound discretion of the court and will be overturned on appeal only for an abuse of that discretion." Streetman, 674 F.Supp. at 234 ; accord United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Broughten v. Voss, 634 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1981). 16 The bankruptcy court granted Attorney Simon's request to withdraw after hearing Wynn's response to the motion in open court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. Eriksson (In re Wynn)
The withdrawal of an attorney in a given case is a “matter entrusted to the sound discretion of the court and will be overturned on appeal only for an abuse of that discretion.” Streetman, 674 F.Supp. at 234 ; accord United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Broughten v. Voss, 634 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirkland v. National Mortgage Network, Inc.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976) ten banc ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that “courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirkland v. National Mortgage Network, Inc.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that "courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do").
cited
Cited "see"
Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 , 1219 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kleiner v. First National Bank
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 , 1219 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. Ross
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976), *1173 cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bundy v. State
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
General Brewing Company v. Law Firms Of Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & O'hearn
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1222 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
General Brewing Co. v. Law Firms of Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & O'hearn
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1222 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruel Frank Brown, Jr.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Don Raymond Poteet
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Weisberg v. United States Dept. of Justice
See Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 891 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical
Other circuits have approved dismissal of an attorney for pursuing frivolous theories, e.g., United States v. Masat, 896 F.2d 88, 92 (5th Cir.1990); for violation of the rules of professional conduct which resulted in an “erosion of public confidence in the integrity of the bar and of the legal system,” United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); or for misconduct in open court that substantially impeded the orderly administration of justice, e.g., United States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619, 627 (10th Cir.1990); se…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the Army
An agency is not required by the FOIA to mail copies of records, “nor even to provide a requester-convenient location for access.” Tax Analysts, 845 F.2d at 1067 ; see also Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 892 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977) (agency not required to mail copies of requested records or pay travel expenses to obtain the requested records).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin L. Cabra and Claude \Buddy\" Leach"
See also United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1223-24 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Edward Gaston
See also United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1224-25 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (no error in the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera inspection of records of an FBI investigation of a matter collateral to defendant’s case where there was no indication that the rec *613 ords contained material information since the defendant’s Brady theory was highly speculative and was rebutted by two FBI agents).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nolen
v.
Brown, Secretary of Defense
v.
Brown, Secretary of Defense
No. 76-5757.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.