discussed Cited "see" Reed v. Heckler See McGrath v. Weinberger, 541 F.2d 249, 253 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1557 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); cf. Heckler v. Lopez, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 221, 224 , 78 L.Ed.2d 217 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting in part from memorandum decision denying application to vacate stay).

discussed Cited "see" Reed v. Heckler See McGrath v. Weinberger, 541 F.2d 249, 253 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. 1557 , 51 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); cf. Heckler v. Lopez, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 221, 224 , 78 L.Ed.2d 217 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting in part from memorandum decision denying application to vacate stay).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Daniel King Brainard, United States of America v. Halton Q. Bittick, Jr. See also United States v. Harris, 542 F.2d 1283, 1316 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct. 1557 , 51 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977), wherein it was held that “rarely are trials perfect, and improprieties in argument by counsel do not call for a new trial unless they are of a nature as probably to prejudice the defendant and the prejudice is not neutralized by the trial judge before submission of the case to the jury.” (citation omitted). .