Montana Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 430 U.S. 953 (1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Montana Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 430 U.S. 953 (1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Removability cannot be created by defendant pleading a counterclaim presenting a federal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 .”
25 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Concordia v. J. Thomas Bendekovic, Jr., Lt. G. Simpson, Bruce Lee McCormick Leonard Leo Lanham (ca11, 1982-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) John Concordia v. J. Thomas Bendekovic, Jr., Lt. G. Simpson, Bruce Lee McCormick Leonard Leo Lanham
11th Cir. · 1982 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
removability cannot be created by defendant pleading a counterclaim presenting a federal question under 28 u.s.c. 1331 .
discussed Cited "see" Koppel v. Wien
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gulf & Western Industries, supra. Defendants complied with this statutory obligation by disclosing the conflicts. 7 In addition, the Second Circuit, citing Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc., 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977), has stated “that violation of any such state-law fiduciary duties, including non-disclosure of conflicts of interest ... will not support a claim of constructive fraud under § 14(a) ____” Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1084 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Witness Agosto
D. Nev. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caesar v. Mountanos, 542 F.2d 1064, 1067-68 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); In re Lifschutz, 2 Cal.3d 415, 431 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 839-40 , 467 P.2d 557, 567-68 (1970).
cited Cited "see" Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montana Power Company v. EPA, 430 U.S. 953 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977).
cited Cited "see" Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montana Power Company v. EPA, 430 U.S. 953 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977).
cited Cited "see" The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 335 , 540 F.2d 1114 , 1136 (1976), cert. granted on different issues, 430 U.S. 953 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977).
cited Cited "see" Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sierra Club v. EPA, 176 U.S. App.D.C. 335, 540 F.2d 1114 , 1136 (1976), cert. granted on different issues, 430 U.S. 953 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 802 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Wildlife Federation v. Benn
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Sierra Club v. EPA, 540 F.2d 1114 , 1123-24 (D.C.Cir.1976), cer t. denied in part, 430 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 1610 , 51 L.Ed.2d 811 , cert. granted in part, 430 U.S. 953 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 802 , vacated and remanded, 434 *1245 U.S. 809, 98 S.Ct. 41 , 54 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977) (applying arbitrary and capricious standard of review); Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, supra, 541 F.2d at 33-37 (court must hold agency to “certain minimal standards of rationality”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Montana Power Co.
v.
United States Environmental Protection Agency American Petroleum Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Alabama Power Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Western Energy Supply & Transmission Associates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
No. 76-529; No. 76-585; No. 76-594; No. 76-603; No. 76-619; No. 76-620.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1977.
430 U.S. 953
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions:

1. Whether regulations promulgated by the Environmental[*954] Protection Agency to prevent the significant deterioration of air quality are authorized by the Clean Air Act;

2. Whether the Clean Air Act permits the Environmental Protection Agency to adopt regulations which grant to federal land managers and Indian governing bodies power to reclassify federal and Indian lands within their jurisdiction. Cases consolidated and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 176 U. S. App. D. C. 335, 540 F. 2d 1114.