green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Smith
See United States v. Garcia, 546 F.2d 613, 615 (5th Cir.) (“Entrapment cannot result from the inducements of a private citizen but must be the product of conduct by governmental agents.”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 1608 , 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977); see also United States v. Fernandez, 837 F.2d 1031, 1035 (11th Cir.1988) (“A defendant is entitled to have the court instruct the jury on his defense theory only if that theory has an evidentia-ry foundation and the requested instruction presents a cognizable legal defense.”).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred Neville
(4×)
See United States v. Garcia, 546 F.2d 613, 615 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 1608 , 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977); United States v. Mayo, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 171 , 498 F.2d 713 (1974). 10 The contention that defendants raise which we find persuasive is that the nature and extent of police involvement in this crime was so overreaching as to bar prosecution of the defendants as a matter of due process of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffers v. United States
See, Savage v. United States, 547 F.2d 212, 216 (3rd Cir., 1976) (holding that the lack of objection at trial to voir dire examination precluded raising the same issue three years later in a § 2255 motion), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 1608 , 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perez
Acknowledging the general rule that the doctrine of entrapment is inapplicable where the inducement comes from a non-agent private citizen, Pearson v. United States, 378 F.2d 555 (5th Cir.1967); see, e.g., United States v. Garcia, 546 F.2d 613 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 1608 , 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977), Perez argues that his entrapment claim comes within an exception to the rule.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Post Anderton
See also United States v. Garcia, 546 F.2d 613 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958 , 97 S.Ct. 1608 , 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miccio
v.
Zoning Board of Adjustment of Ewing Township
v.
Zoning Board of Adjustment of Ewing Township
No. 76-6223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1977.
Published
Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.