green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Carl L. Combs
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 121-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Anderson, 514 F.2d 583, 587 (7th Cir. 1975); Ward v. Page, 424 F.2d 491, 493 (10th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Giorgio Penco
But see United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809 , 814 n.3 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976). 11 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Alan Gene Kincade v. United States
(2×)
(u)ncertainty as to the possible sentence that might follow from trial of counts to which the defendant has not pleaded guilty cannot invalidate a guilty plea as to that count to which the defendant has pleaded guilty
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raposa
See United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1210-12 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Vandemark, 522 F.2d 1019, 1021-25 (9th Cir.1975); United States v. Schipani, 435 F.2d 26, 27-28 (2d Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 401 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1198 , 28 L.Ed.2d 334 (1971); Verdugo v. United States, 402 F.2d 599, 610-13 (9th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 397 U.S. 925 , 90 S.Ct. 931 , 25 L.Ed.2d 105 (1970). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raposa
See United States v. Lee, ___ _____________ ___ 540 F.2d 1205, 1210-12 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 _____ ______ (1976); United States v. Vandemark, 522 F.2d 1019, 1021-25 (9th _____________ _________ Cir. 1975); United States v. Schipani, 435 F.2d 26, 27-28 (2d _____________ ________ Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 983 (1971); Verdugo v. _____ ______ _______ United States, 402 F.2d 599, 610-13 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. ______________ _____ denied, 397 U.S. 925 (1970). ______ -6- Seizure 1.6, at 40-41 (2d ed. Supp. 1995).3 This court has _______ not yet decided the issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chambers
See United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1210-11 (4th Cir.) (ille- gally seized but reliable information), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976); United States v. Burton, 631 F.2d 280, 282 (4th Cir. 1980) (marital privilege no bar to consideration of financial records).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Headley Chambers
See United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1210-11 (4th Cir.) (illegally seized but reliable information), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976); United States v. Burton, 631 F.2d 280, 282 (4th Cir.1980) (marital privilege no bar to consideration of financial records). 6 Chambers was properly awarded one criminal history point for his 1985 fine for driving under the influence; he had waived counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomblin
See United States v. Meyers, 529 F.2d 1033, 1036-37 (7th Cir.) (affirming conspiracy conviction even though defendants were not officials yet), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 253 , 50 L.Ed.2d 176 (1976). 26 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cox Cable Communications, Inc. v. United States
See, Advocates for the Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792, 794-95 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Winfred Payne, United States of America v. Robert William McCormick
See United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray
See United States v. Meyers, 529 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 253 , 50 L.Ed.2d 176 (1976); United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 , 98 S.Ct. 446 , 46 L.Ed.2d 385 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sepcich
See United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F.2d 318 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1982
See Advocates for Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission
See Advocates for Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loan Kim Barker
See United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence Eugene Wilson v. Leo J. Meyer, Warden
Accord, United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 121-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald E. Muir, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth, Plaintiffs v. Alabama Educational Television Commission Jacob Walker, Etc.
(2×)
See Avins v. Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, 385 F.2d 151 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 855 , 19 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968), and Advocates for the Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe
(2×)
II. 6 Under § 5032 of the 1974 amendments to the FJDA, Pub.L.No.93-415, a person under the age of 18 2 who is not surrendered to state authorities is proceeded against as a juvenile "unless he has requested in writing upon advice of counsel to be proceeded against as an adult . . . ." 3 If proceeded against under the FJDA, a juvenile has neither a constitutional right to a jury trial, United States v. Hill, 538 F.2d 1072, 1074-75 (4th Cir. 1976); United States v. Cuomo, 525 F.2d 1285, 1292 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Torres, 500 F.2d 944, 946-48 (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Salcido-…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Marshall
See United States v. Lee (4th Cir. 1976), 540 F.2d 1205 , certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 894 , and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205 (4th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 ; United States v. Vandemark, 522 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1975); United States v. Schipani, 435 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 401 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1198 , 28 L.Ed.2d 334 , and Verdugo v. United States, 402 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 925 , 90 S.Ct. 931 , 25 L.Ed.2d 105 .
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Paul Bullock, Wayne Lester Bullock and Allen Glen Bullock
See United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 120 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Young, 503 F.2d 1072 , 1074 n.5 (3d Cir. 1974); United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 606 (3d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Armadore
Ed. 2d 682 (1971); State v. Wallen, Docket No. 9-09-22, 2010 WL 529864 , *4 (Ohio App. February 16, 2010), appeal denied, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1463 , 928 N.E.2d 738 (2010); see also United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809 , 814 n.5 (2d Cir.) (‘‘the Supreme Court has rejected a reading of McDonald which would automatically extend stand- ing to a [codefendant]’’), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S. Ct. 254 , 50 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodell v. Williams
See, e.g., United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F.2d 318, 323 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Connelly v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F.2d 318, 323 [3d Cir.], cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 [ 97 S. Ct. 254 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Samoa Government v. Suani
We believe the proper view was expressed by the court in United States v. Schipani, 435 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 983 (1971); see also United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1212 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 894 (1976) (holding that evidence excluded during trial can be considered at sentencing); but see Verdugo v. United States, 402 F.2d 599, 609-13 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 925 (1970) (stating that certain illegally obtained evidence could not be considered at sentencing hearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Z
As we stated in Matter of Patel, supra, "[Ole critical point in such cases is that freedom from official restraint exists, not that such freedom has been exercised." Id. at 9; see also, e.g., United States v. Martin Plascencia, 532 F.2d 1316 - (9th Ch.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976) (finding that an alien at a port of entry effected an entry when he evaded inspectors and fled 50 yards into San Ysidro, California).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G
See, e.g., United States v. Martin- Plasencia, 532 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976) (finding that an alien at a port of entry effected an entry when he evaded inspectors and fled 50 yards into San Ysidro, California); Cheng v. //TS, 534 F.2d 1018, 1019 (2d Cir. 1976); Matter of Z- , 20 I&N Dec. 707 (BIA 1993) (finding that an alien who debarks from his vessel at a place not designated as a port of entry effected an entry when he fled into the interior undetected with every apparent intention of evading immigration inspection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wiltz v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F.2d 318, 323 (CA3), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derek Antern, A/K/A Peter McGregor
See, e.g., United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809, 814 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frasier v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
See Dumschat, 452 U.S. at 466 , 101 S.Ct. at 2465 ; see also Advocates for the Arts v. Thomson, 532 F.2d 792, 797 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976) (no entitlement to funds for arts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lynch
Thus, excluding all illegally seized evidence would frustrate the federal policy, codified, in part, in the Act and the Sentencing Guidelines, that judges consider all relevant and reliable facts in order to assure that each defendant receives an individualized sentence. 13 In contrast to this clear detrimental effect on the sentencing process, “the potential benefit from extension of the exclusionary rule is slight.” Vandemark, 522 F.2d at 1022 ; see also United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1211 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976) (additional det…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earl Charles Lynch
Thus, excluding all illegally seized evidence would frustrate the federal policy, codified, in part, in the Act and the Sentencing Guidelines, that judges consider all relevant and reliable facts in order to assure that each defendant receives an individualized sentence. 13 37 In contrast to this clear detrimental effect on the sentencing process, "the potential benefit from extension of the exclusionary rule is slight." Vandemark, 522 F.2d at 1022 ; see also United States v. Lee, 540 F.2d 1205, 1211 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976) (additional dete…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark Wellington
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir.) (when allowing dual representation, trial court “did not abuse its discretion in [placing] limitations ... upon defendant’s participation as his own counsel”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F.2d 318, 323 (CA3), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kay
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Cruz, 709 F.2d 111, 113 (1st Cir. 1983); United States v. Holman, 728 F.2d 809 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 388 , 83 L.Ed.2d 323 (1984); Myers v. Frazier, W.Va., 319 S.E.2d 782 (1984); cf. People v. Tourtellotte, 88 Wash.2d 579 , 564 P.2d 799 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas v. McCullough
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Hawthorne, 532 F. 2d 318, 323 (CA3), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 894 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Rodriguez Cruz
E.g., United States v. Sanchez, 609 F.2d 761, 762 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 637 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Bullock, 579 F.2d 1116, 1118 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 456 , 58 L.Ed.2d 425 (1978); United States v. Jerry, 487 F.2d 600, 606 (3d Cir.1973); United States v. Rocco, 397 F.Supp. 655 (D.Mass.1975); Stowers v. State, 266 Ind. 403 , 363 N.E.2d 978, 982 (Ind.1977); see also United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.) (assuming withou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheck v. Baileyville School Committee
See also Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09 , 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972), for cases requiring explicit standards for the guidance of those who apply them, particularly where the statute "abuts upon sensitive areas of basic First Amendment freedoms," id. at 109, 92 S.Ct. at 2299. [15] Although the First Circuit has sustained discretionary state action withholding funds from a literary magazine because of a poem which officials considered "an item of filth," the court found it "most troubling" that the denial of support "should be based on a reading of just one…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Josiah
See, e. g., United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809, 812 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 [ 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 ] (1976) (prosecution’s possible concession at trial that defendant had standing to challenge search a concession as to question of law and therefore not binding on court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1981
See, e. g., United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809, 812 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 ( 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 ) (1976) (prosecution's possible concession at trial that defendant had standing to challenge search a concession as to question of law and therefore not binding on court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Norman Burton, Jr.
See United States v. Morgan (9th Cir. 1979), 595 F.2d 1134, 1136-37 ; Smith v. United States (10th Cir.), 551 F.2d 1193, 1196 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 113 , 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977); see also United States v. Lee, (4th Cir.) 540 F.2d 1205, 1210-11 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State
See e. g., United States v. Williams, 8th Cir., 534 F.2d 119 (1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Hill, 10th Cir., 526 F.2d 1019 (1975), cert. den. 425 U.S. 940 , 96 S.Ct. 1676 , 48 L.Ed.2d 182 (1976); United States v. Wolfish, 2d Cir., 525 F.2d 457 (1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); Brasier v. Jeary, 8th Cir., 256 F.2d 474 (1958), cert. den. 358 U.S. 867 , 79 S.Ct. 97 , 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958), reh. den. 358 U.S. 923 , 79 S.Ct. 286 , 3 L.Ed.2d 242 (1958); Goodspeed v. Estelle, N.D.Tex., 436 F.Supp. 1383 (197…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry A. Molt, Jr
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Tortorello, 533 F.2d 809 (2nd Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 254 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976); United States v. Faruolo, 506 F.2d 490 (2nd Cir. 1974); United States v. Gavic, 520 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1975); United States v. Agosto, 502 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lippi
See also United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 122-23 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976). 14 .
Board of Education of Independent School District No. 53 of Oklahoma County
v.
Board of Education of Independent School District No. 52 of Oklahoma County
v.
Board of Education of Independent School District No. 52 of Oklahoma County
No. 75-1799.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.