green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1983 ·
…it was a violation of fundamental principles of state-federal relations for a federal judge to enjoin two state judges and their court personnel, when an injunction against the litigant would have accomplished the same purpose.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
R.W.T., K.M.R., and T.S.C., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friends and Attorneys, Kenneth A. Cohn, Robert J. Goodwin, Michael L. Lyons, Jeanette Ganousis, David C. Howard, and Adrienne E. Volenik, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Honorable Donald E. Dalton the Honorable David Dalton the Honorable Fred Rush the Honorable Charles R. Schroeder the Honorable William T. Lohmar the Honorable Richard Zerr and the Honorable Kathie Guyton, the Honorable Paul Williams the Honorable Charles Schwendemann the Honorable Peggy Coppage the Honorable Donald Boehmer Guy L. Koester, Sheriff Cliston Hilton, Sheriff Dave Jenkins, Sheriff Raymond J. Grush, Juvenile Officer and Gerald W. Paul, Deputy Juvenile Officer, R.W.T., K.M.R., and T.S.C., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friends and Attorneys, Kenneth A. Cohn, Robert J. Goodwin, Michael L. Lyons, Jeanette Ganousis, David C. Howard, and Adrienne E. Volenik, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Honorable Donald E. Dalton the Honorable David Dalton the Honorable Fred Rush the Honorable Charles R. Schroeder the Honorable William T. Lohmar the Honorable Richard Zerr the Honorable Kathie Guyton the Honorable Paul Williams the Honorable Charles Schwendemann the Honorable Peggy Coppage the Honorable Donald Boehmer Guy L. Koester, Sheriff Cliston Hilton, Sheriff Dave Jenkins, Sheriff Raymond J. Grush, Juvenile Officer and Gerald W. Paul, Deputy Juvenile Officer
it was a violation of fundamental principles of state-federal relations for a federal judge to enjoin two state judges and their court personnel, when an injunction against the litigant would have accomplished the same purpose.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
R.W.T. ex rel Cohn v. Dalton
it was a violation of fundamental principles of state-federal relations for a federal judge to enjoin two state judges and their court personnel, when an injunction against the litigant would have accomplished the same purpose.
cited
Cited "see"
Aman v. State
See Abbott v. State, 334 So.2d 642, 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), certiorari denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. McCoy Restaurants, Inc.
A state court is as well qualified as a federal court to protect a litigant by the doctrines of res *586 adjudicata and collateral estoppel.” Southern California Petroleum Corp. v. Harper, 273 F.2d 715, 719 (5th Cir.1960); see Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 549 F.2d 1052, 1061 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel Gibson, III v. George L. Jackson, Individually and as Superior Court Judge of Jones County, Georgia
(2×)
See Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 6 Cir. 1977, 549 F.2d 1052, 1058 , Cert. denied, 1977, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 ; Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee v. Nottingham Liquors, Ltd., 6 Cir. 1976, 542 F.2d 652, 654 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Kelly
See Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 549 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, __U.S.__, 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1977) (state court civil proceedings alleged to violate full faith and credit); Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee v. Nottingham Liquors, 542 F.2d 652 (6th Cir. 1976) (labor dispute); *164 Williams v. Williams, 532 F.2d 120 (8th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (termination of parental rights); 19 Ahrensfeld v. Stephens, 528 F.2d 193 (7th Cir. 1975) (eminent domain); McCune v. Frank, 521 F.2d 1152 (2d Cir. 1975) (police grooming regulations); 20 Lynch v. Snepp, 472 F.2d 769 (4th C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacKlin v. State
Paul v. State, 385 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 1980); Tyson v. State, supra ; United States v. Marionneaux, supra ; compare Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.152(a)(2) [providing for severance of properly joined offenses if prejudice is shown and giving the trial court discretion to make this determination, see, e.g., Abbott v. State, 334 So.2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1977)]. [4] Ordinarily, it would be unnecessary to consider Macklin's other points on appeal.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers v. Fort Pitt Steel Casting Division-Conval-Penn Inc.
See, e. g., United States Steel Corp. v. UMW, 548 F.2d 67 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers Of America v. Fort Pitt Steel Casting Division-Conval-Penn Inc.
See, e. g., United States Steel Corp. v. UMW, 548 F.2d 67 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 968 , 97 S.Ct. 2926 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pfotzer
v.
Amercoat Corp.
v.
Amercoat Corp.
No. 76-1459.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1977.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.