green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
H & B Equipment Company, Inc. v. International Harvester Company
But see Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 801-803 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "but see"
Williams v. DeKalb County
But see Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 801-803 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
R.C. Dick Geothermal Corp. v. Thermogenics, Inc.
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 803 (9th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Association v. Klamath Medical Service Bureau
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 803 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service Bureau
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 803 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gweldon Lee Paschall and All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Company
(2×)
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 803 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977) (exercise of contractual right of termination "can hardly be deemed 'unfair' ").
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy Tugboat Company v. Crowley
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 812 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 812 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tripper Corp. v. Chrysler Corp.
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 803 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977); see also Golden Gate Acceptance Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 597 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Summa Corporation
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 801-02 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Summa Corp.
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 801-02 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 813-14 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, *712 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Newberry v. Washington Post Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 812 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
DuPont Glore Forgan Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 801-02 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977); George R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Santa Clara Valley Distributing Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 806-10 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977); Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F.2d 1352, 1355-57 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 813 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santa Clara Valley Distributing Co., Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Company
See Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 806-10 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977); Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F.2d 1352, 1355-57 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074 , 97 S.Ct. 813 , 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strauss Ex Rel. Servico, Inc. v. American Holdings, Inc.
See, e.g., Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795 , 801-03 & n. 4 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977); America’s Best Cinema Corp. v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, Inc., 347 F.Supp. 328, 331-32 (N.D.Ind.1972); Windsor Theatre Co. v. Walbrook Amusement Co., 94 F.Supp. 388 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc.
The focus is on anti-competitive intent and conduct, not the possibility of successful monopolization and therefore the relevant market is not an essential issue. “[A] prima facie case of attempt to monopolize is made out by evidence of a specific intent to monopolize ‘any part’ of commerce, plus anti-competitive conduct directed to the accomplishment of that unlawful purpose.” Greyhound Computer v. International Business Machines, 559 F.2d 488, 504 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1040 , 98 S.Ct. 782 , 54 L.Ed.2d 790 (1978); see also Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.
See also Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 804-05 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corporation
See also Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795, 804-05 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley
See, e. g., Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc., 548 F.2d 795 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2977 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1977) (dealers permitted to recover difference between the price they would have charged and the price they were compelled to charge by reason of a vertical price fixing agreement); Cackling Acres, Inc. v. Olson Farms, Inc., 541 F.2d 242 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977) (producers permitted to recover difference between the price they were paid and the price they would have received but for the unlawful horiz…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Lite Distributors, Inc. v. Northwest Industries, Inc.
However, even assuming the truth of such an allegation, this Court “cannot conclude that such discussions constitute a combination within the meaning of Section 1 of the Sherman Act or that they represent more than internal dialogue leading to a decision on the part of a single business unit * * *.” Beckman v. Walter Kidde & Co., 316 F.Supp. 1321, 1326 (E.D.N.Y.1970) (emphasis supplied), aff’d per curiam, 451 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 2488 , 33 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972); Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Management Co., 553 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1977); see …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moody et ux.
v.
Willie et ux.
v.
Willie et ux.
No. 76-1551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir.