green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 ·
…the misuse of public office is said to supply the element of coercion.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Harold Oxman, United States of America v. William H. Pflaumer
(2×)
But see United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-47 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976) 9 The district court suggested that because Pflaumer was present during post-trial hearings and chose not to testify--"thereby denying the government an opportunity to cross-examine him on [his knowledge]," App. at 1673--an inference might be drawn from his refusal to testify that Pflaumer in fact knew of the Wille agreement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Superior Oil Company v. Huey Fulmer James Branch Roy Nichols and Any Other Persons Claiming an Interest in Property Described Further in These Pleadings, Superior Oil Company v. Huey Fulmer James Branch Roy Nichols and Any Other Persons Claiming an Interest in Property Described Further in These Pleadings
the racketeering acts must have been connected to each other by some common scheme, plan or motive so as to constitute a pattern and not simply a series of disconnected acts.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allington v. Carpenter
the racketeering acts must have been connected with each other by some common scheme, plan or motive
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. James A. Kelly, Jr.
(2×)
the misuse of public office is said to supply the element of coercion.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
To establish such a case, the defendant must first show that he is a member of a cognizable racial group, Castaneda v. Partida, supra, 430 U.S., at 494, 97 S.Ct., at 1280, and that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges to remove from the venire members of the defendant’s race.... [T]he defendant must [then] show that these facts and any other relevant circumstances raise an inference that the prosecutor used that practice to exclude the veniremen from the petit jury on account of their race.
cited
Cited "see"
Clancy v. Commissioner of Correctional Services
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-46 (2d Cir.1975), cerf. denied 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 66, 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arena
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 396 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Daley, 564 F.2d 645, 649 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 933 , 98 S.Ct. 1508 , 55 L.Ed.2d 530 (1978); United States v. Traitz, 871 F.2d 368, 390 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 821 , 110 S.Ct. 78 , 107 L.Ed.2d 44 (1989); United States v. Billups, 692 F.2d 320 , 321 n. 7 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820 , 104 S.Ct. 84 , 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983); United States v. Gerald, 624 F.2d 1291, 1299 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920 , 101 S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Moore
When alleged perjury is involved, not only must defendant demónstrate that the witness committed perjury, see United States v. White, 972 F.2d 16, 20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 669 , 121 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992), but also “that the jury probably would have acquitted in the absence of the false testimony.” Sanchez, 969 F.2d at 1413-14 ; see United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-46 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sabbagh
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-46 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); United States v. Krasny, 607 F.2d 840, 844-45 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 942 , 100 S.Ct. 1337 , 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Butterworth
See, ___ e.g., United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 395 (1st Cir.), ____ _____________ ________ cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvarez v. United States
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 246 (2d Cir.1975) ("this court has noted that Mesarosh is a sui generis case") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 66, 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); United States v. Rosner, 516 F.2d 269, 282 (2d Cir.1975) ("It is true that on the strange facts of the Mesarosh case, a majority of the court voted for a new trial rather than a hearing, but,....[i]t was the government that moved in the Supreme Court for a hearing in the trial court.”), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3198 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1203 (1976); United States v. Zane, 507 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carluin Sanchez
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-46 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 66, 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); cf. United States v. Wallach, 935 F.2d 445, 458 (2d Cir.1991) (applying Stofsky formulation and concluding that jury probably would have acquitted defendants).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kamel Kamel and Musa Khabbas
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir.1975) ("it must be recognized that in the interest of according finality to a jury’s verdict, a motion for a new trial based upon previously-undiscovered evidence is ordinarily 'not favored and should be granted only with great caution.’") (quoting United States v. Costello, 255 F.2d 876, 879 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 937 , 78 S.Ct. 1385 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1551 (1958)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976). 9 .See also Shore v. Warden, Stateville Prison, 942 F.2d 1117, 1124 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, —…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Tormos-Vega, United States of America v. Juan Luis Boscio
(2×)
See United States v. Jarabek, 726 *1113 F.2d 889, 901 (1st Cir.1984) (Hobbs Act requires a “ ‘realistic probability that extortionate transaction will have some effect on interstate commerce’ ”) (quoting United States v. DiGregorio, 605 F.2d 1184, 1190 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 287 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979)) (quoting United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 396 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976)) (emphasis added).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Fabio Rodriguez Cortes, United States v. Eduardo Ocampo-Hoyos, United States v. Rafael Perez Martinez
(4×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 402 (1st Cir.) (“[t]he court has discretion in the handling of alleged noncompliance with discovery orders”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976), and cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Parker, Gary Phillips, and Keith Moon
In order to obtain a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the moving defendant must show, inter alia, that the new evidence would “probably lead to an acquittal.” United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d 466, 479 (2d Cir.1980); see United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir.1975) (new evidence generally does not entitle defendant to a new trial unless it is likely to produce a different verdict), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael D. McKenna United States of America v. Robert v. Campo
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 396-97 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Freedman, 562 F.Supp. 1378, 1387 (N.D.Ill.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Taylor, United States of America v. Antonio Nigo-Martinez and Salvador Jaraba, United States of America v. Paul Clemenic, United States of America v. Jerald Wilson, United States of America v. Jerry Rosenstein and Donald Sanders
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 247-48 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 66 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318, 321 (2d Cir.1975); Marrapese, 610 F.Supp. at 1010 ; Ramsey v. Hand, 185 Kan. 350 , 343 P.2d 225, 233 , cert. denied, 362 U.S. 970 , 80 S.Ct. 956 , 4 L.Ed.2d 901 (1960) 16 The fact that the 1984 Grand Jury did not appear before Judge McGarr from March 18 until April 1, 1986, Smith, No. 86 CR 272, slip op. at 3, does not contradict Judge McGarr's finding that he determined in March of 1986 that the Grand Jury had not finished its business…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 247-48 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 66 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318, 321 (2d Cir.1975); Marrapese, 610 F.Supp. at 1010 ; Ramsey v. Hand, 185 Kan. 350 , 343 P.2d 225, 233 , cert. denied, 362 U.S. 970 , 80 S.Ct. 956 , 4 L.Ed.2d 901 (1960). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Grayson, A/K/A White Bear, United States of America v. Charles Moore, A/K/A Uncle Charlie, United States of America v. Michael Lawless, A/K/A Caveman, United States of America v. Charles McKnight A/K/A McNut United States of America v. Donald Robinson, A/K/A Dino, United States of America v. Michael Giordano, A/K/A Bugsy, United States of America v. John Gavis, A/K/A Wacker John
See United States v. Stofsky, 409 F.Supp. 609, 614 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd on other grounds, 527 F.2d 237 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976) (racketeering acts must have been connected with each other by some common scheme, plan or motive so as to constitute a pattern and not simply a series of disconnected acts); United States v. Starnes, 644 F.2d 673, 677-78 (7th Cir.1981); United States v. Moeller, 402 F.Supp. 49, 57-58 (D.Conn.1975). 48 The Supreme Court in Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3275 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985), …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Grayson
See United States v. Stofsky, 409 F.Supp. 609, 614 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd on other grounds, 527 F.2d 237 (2d Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976) (racketeering acts must have been connected with each other by some common scheme, plan or motive so as to constitute a pattern and not simply a series of disconnected acts); United States v. Starnes, 644 F.2d 673, 677-78 (7th Cir.1981); United States v. Moeller, 402 F.Supp. 49, 57-58 (D.Conn.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Major Realty Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See Biedenharn Realty Co. v. United States, 526 F.2d 409 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevenson v. State
See United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 247 (2d Cir.1975) (key issue in dispute would not have been affected by new evidence), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); United States v. Krasny, 607 F.2d 840, 845 (9th Cir.1979) (when a key witness’s testimony is false it may be probable that an acquittal would result on retrial; this may not be so “when a rather inconsequential witness has prevaricated on a minor or collateral issue.”), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 942 , 100 S.Ct. 1337 , 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980); United States v. Jackson, 579 F.2d 553, 557 (10th Cir.) (r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnesota v. Heckler
(2×)
No. 1230, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 280-81 (1972); see Kantrowitz v. Weinberger, 388 F.Supp. 1127, 1129-30 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d, 174 U.S. App.D.C. 182, 530 F.2d 1034 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); cf. 42 C.F.R. § 440.140 (a)(ii) (1982) (IMDs must meet general requirements of a psychiatric hospital to be included in Medicaid coverage for those over age 64).
discussed
Cited "see"
3 soc.sec.rep.ser. 108, Medicare&medicaid Gu 33,413 State of Minnesota, by Its Commissioner of Public Welfare, Arthur E. Noot v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services, State of Minnesota, by Its Commissioner of Public Welfare, Arthur E. Noot v. Margaret M. Heckler, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
(2×)
No. 1230, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 280-81 (1972); see Kantrowitz v. Weinberger, 388 F.Supp. 1127, 1129-30 (D.D.C.1974), aff'd, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 182 , 530 F.2d 1034 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); cf. 42 C.F.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward Ringland
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 398 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Ricco Ray
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 390 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
John P. DECKER, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
(2×)
See United States v. Blitz, 533 F.2d 1329, 1345 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry E. Williams
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Trotta, 525 F.2d 1096, 1099-1101 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205 , 1229 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 233 , 34 L.Ed.2d 176 (1972); United States v. Price, 507 F.2d 1349, 1350 (4th Cir. 1974) (alternative holding); United States v. Harding, 563 F.2d 299, 306-07 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1062 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978); U…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Trotta, 525 F.2d 1096, 1099-1101 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205, 1229 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 233 , 34 L.Ed.2d 176 (1972); United States v. Price, 507 F.2d 1349, 1350 (4th Cir. 1974) (alternative holding); United States v. Harding, 563 F.2d 299, 306-07 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1062 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978); Un…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard J. Rabbitt
(2×)
See United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. McGinnis
Under circumstances indicating neglect, “the test ‘is whether there was a significant chance that this added item, developed by skilled counsel ... could have induced a reasonable doubt in the minds of enough jurors to avoid a conviction.’ ” Id. (quoting United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1333 (2d Cir.1974)); see also United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir.1975) (inadvertent but negligent failure of prosecutor to disclose evidence that is of exculpatory or impeaching nature “loosens the standard of review” and require reversal only if there is a “significant c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Biaggi
Rule 33 motions for a new trial “are granted only with great caution ... in the most extraordinary circumstances.” Sanders v. Sullivan, 863 F.2d 218, 225 (2d Cir.1988) (citing U.S. v. DiPaolo, 835 F.2d 46, 49 (2d Cir.1987); see also U.S. v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir.1975), cert. den. 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 66 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abel Mariano Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 395 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abel A. Mariano, Jr., United States of America v. Barry Butterworth
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 395 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Mazzanti
Two circuits have rejected Larrison in favor of a probability standard, at least for situations in which "the government did not knowingly or negligently use the perjured testimony.” United States v. Krasny, 607 F.2d 840, 844-45 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 942 , 100 S.Ct. 1337 , 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980); see also United States v. Stofsky, 527 F.2d 237, 245-46 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 66, 50 L.Ed.2d *1030 80 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C & K Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Yeutter
The Administrator must make the determination whether use of the materials pending the outcome of the hearing will “present an imminent hazard to public health.” 9 C.F.R. § 317.20 (e); see also Natick Paperboard Corp. v. Weinberger, 498 F.2d 125, 129 (1st Cir.1974), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Boylan, United States of America v. John E. Carey, United States of America v. Thomas J. Connolly, United States of America v. Matthew A. Kilroe, United States of America v. John F. McCormick United States of America v. Kenneth J. Nave, United States of America v. Francis X. Sheehan
(2×)
Other courts have rejected this interpretation, ruling that inducement is not required if Hobbs Act extortion occurs "under color of official right." See, e.g., United States v. Holzer, 816 F.2d 304, 311 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1076 , 108 S.Ct. 1054 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1988); United States v. Spitler, 800 F.2d 1267, 1274-75 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Swift, 732 F.2d 878, 880 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1158 , 105 S.Ct. 905 , 83 L.Ed.2d 920 (1985); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 595 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boylan
(2×)
In the past, we have successfully avoided this issue, 11 see United States v. Jarabek, 726 F.2d 889 , 904 n. 16 (1st Cir.1984); see also United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 394 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976), and do so again.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Superior Oil Co. v. Fulmer
See, e.g., United States v. Stofsky, 409 F.Supp. 609, 612-14 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd, 527 F.2d 237 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct; 66, 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976) ("The racketeering acts must have been connected to each other by some common scheme, plan or motive so as to constitute a pattern and not simply a series of disconnected acts.”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelecTV of California, Inc.
Id.; see also United States v. Stofsky, 409 F.Supp. 609, 614 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff 'd, 527 F.2d 237 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 66 , 50 L.Ed.2d 80 (1976); cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3575 (e) (“criminal conduct forms a pattern if it embraces criminal acts that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gilbert L. Dozier
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 393 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976) (permitting conviction, without proof of duress, of Executive Director of municipal Redevelopment Authority who demanded kickbacks from construction contractors).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Major Realty Corp. v. Commissioner
See also Biedenharn Realty Co. v. United States , 526 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1976) , cert. denied 429 U.S. 819 ↩ (1976) . 41.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William M. Reese and Catholeen Reese v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See, e. g., Biedenharn Realty Co. v. United States, 526 F.2d 409 , 416 n.25 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman
See, e.g., United States v. Blitz, 533 F.2d 1329, 1344-45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 65 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976) (prosecutor’s “ministerial act” of reading testimony from prior grand jury to second grand jury held proper): cf. United States v. Litton Systems, Inc., 573 F.2d 195, 201 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 99 S.Ct. 101 , 58 L.Ed.2d 121 reh. denied, 439 U.S. 997 , 99 S.Ct. 600 , 58 L.Ed.2d 671 (1978) (federal agents summarized prior grand jury evidence). 2 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert McPartlin
(4×)
See, e. g., United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386 (1st Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-Party
(2×)
Briefly, we see no abuse of discretion in the following: admitting projections of plaintiff’s loss of future earning power; refusing to admit evidence of post-accident repairs to the machine, Fed.R.Evid. 407; permitting extensive cross-examination of witness Cabassa concerning the whereabouts of long-absent blueprints, Hobart v. O’Brien, 243 F.2d 735, 743 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 830 , 78 S.Ct. 42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 42 (1957); see also United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 401 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); refusing to admit statement of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David M. Fender, Trust No. 1, Harris R. Fender, Trustee, and Thomas H. Sharp, Trustee v. United States of America, Harris R. Fender, Jr., Trust No. 1, Harris R. Fender, Trustee, and Thomas H. Sharp, Trustee v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Biedenharn Realty Co., Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1976, 526 F.2d 409 , 416 n.25 (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); Casner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 379, 387 ; Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 1185, 1192 ; American National Bank of Austin v. United States, 5 Cir., 1970, 421 F.2d 442, 451 . 4 In deciding to sell the Bender Bonds, the taxpayers were motivated by the possibility of tax avoidance.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McClure v. Hopper
(2×)
See, e. g., Biedenharn Realty Co., Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1976, 526 F.2d 409 , 416 n.25 (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 , 97 S.Ct. 64 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); Casner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 379, 387 ; Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 1185, 1192 ; American National Bank of Austin v. United States, 5 Cir., 1970, 421 F.2d 442, 451 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kantrowitz
v.
Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
v.
Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 75-1522.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.