green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. F.C.C., 537 F.2d 787 , 794 (4th Cir.1976) ("NCUC I”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976) (quoting Katz v. A.T. & T., 43 F.C.C. 1328 , 1332 (1953)), to the effect that, “[w]ere the Commission to exercise its jurisdiction only where the telephone facilities in question were exclusively interstate in character, it would result in virtually complete abdication from the field of telephone regulation____” .
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia State Corporation Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. F.C.C., 537 F.2d 787 , 794 (4th Cir.1976) ("NCUC I"), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976) (quoting Katz v. A.T. & T., 43 F.C.C. 1328 , 1332 (1953)), to the effect that, "[w]ere the Commission to exercise its jurisdiction only where the telephone facilities in question were exclusively interstate in character, it would result in virtually complete abdication from the field of telephone regulation...." 3 For example, under the "vintage year" method, all types of telephone cable installed during one year (regardless of vari…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox Cable Communications, Inc. v. Simpson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. F.C.C., 537 F.2d 787 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976); Sherdon v. Dann, 193 Neb. 768 , 229 N.W.2d 531 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976) (hereinafter cited as NCUC I); North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 552 F.2d 1036 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 874 , 98 S.Ct. 222 , 54 L.Ed.2d 154 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
New York State Commission On Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 , 790-91 n.2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
New York State Commission on Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
See North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 , 790-91 n.2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Ronald Hamilton
(2×)
See United States v. LaBare, 542 F.2d 926 (4 Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 630 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neely v. Benefits Review Board
(2×)
See, e.g., North Carolina Utilities Comm'n v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 , 791 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976); Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Federal Power Comm'n, 606 F.2d 1373 , 1380 (D.C.Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. State
(2×)
See also Cousins v. State, 277 Md. 383 , 354 A.2d 825 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 652 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976) (where defendant wielded a knife against two store detectives, acquittal on charge of assaulting one detective did not bar subsequent prosecution for assault against the other detective because the two were separate offenses); Harris v. State, 42 Md.App. 248, 258 , 400 A.2d 6 , rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCC
See, e. g., North Carolina Utilities Comm'n v. FCC, 537 F. 2d 787 (CA4), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1027 (1976), and North Carolina Utilities Comm'n v. FCC, 552 F. 2d 1036 (CA4), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 874 (1977) (Where FCC acted within its authority to permit subscribers to provide their own telephones, pre-emption of inconsistent state regulation prohibiting subscribers from connecting their own phones unless used exclusively in interstate service upheld since state regulation would negate the federal tariff). [5] Respondents maintain that since "[s]pecific terms prevail over the general," Fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e. g., North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 537 F. 2d 787 (CA4), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1027 (1976), and North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 552 F. 2d 1036 (CA4), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 874 (1977) (Where FCC acted within its authority to permit subscribers to provide their own telephones, pre-emption of inconsistent state regulation prohibiting subscribers from connecting their own phones unless used ex- elusively in interstate service upheld since state regulation would negate the federal tariff).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Corporation Commission Of The State Of Kansas v. Federal Communications Commission
"FCC regulations must preempt any contrary state regulations where the efficiency ... of the national communications network is at stake...." NCUC II, 552 F.2d at 1046; see also North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 , 793 (4th Cir.) (NCUC I ) (state order impairing policy for connection of customer equipment with interstate network), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976). 18 In imposing an SPF freeze, the Commission had already determined that effective governance of interstate service demanded at least a temporary halt in the growth of non-traff…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
“FCC regulations must preempt any contrary state regulations where the efficiency ... of the national communications network is at stake____” NCUC II, 552 F.2d at 1046; see also North Carolina Utilities Commission v. FCC, 537 F.2d 787 , 793 (4th Cir.) (NCUC I) (state order impairing policy for connection of customer equipment with interstate network), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 651 , 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles C. Clark and Jay G. Denney
See also United States v. Rauhoff, 525 F.2d 1170 , *542 1176 (7th Cir. 1975), citing United States v. Sampson. 6 In Ohrynowicz v. United States, 542 F.2d 715 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027 , 97 S.Ct. 650 , 50 L.Ed.2d 630 (1976), this court held that a mailing which was a normal concomitant of a transaction that was essential to the fraudulent scheme was made for the purpose of executing that scheme.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chappelle v. Greater Baton Rouge Airport District
(2×)
Comm’n, 424 U. S. 645 (1976); Detroit Police Officers Assn. v. Detroit, 405 U. S. 950 (1972); see also Bute v. Quinn, 535 F. 2d 1285 (CA7), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1027 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yanez-Osorio
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5711.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1976.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.