green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Clancy v. Commissioner of Correctional Services
See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972), United States v. Seijo, 514 F.2d 1357 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1043 , 97 S.Ct. 745 , 50 L.Ed.2d 756 (1977), and United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devery
Although mindful that the credibility of a key government witness can by itself play “a factor of central importance” in the conviction of the accused, Stofsky, 527 F.2d at 243 ; see United States v. Seijo, 514 F.2d 1357, 1364 (2d Cir.1975) (“The taint of ... false testimony is not erased because his untruthfulness affects only his credibility as a witness. ‘The jury’s estimate of the truthfulness and reliability of a given witness may well be determinative of guilt or innocence....’”) (quoting Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 , 79 S.Ct. 1173, 1177 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959)), c…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
Though the court should avoid making the defendant’s burden overly difficult by “straining to postulate ‘hypertechnical and unrealistic’ grounds on which the jury could conceivably have rested its conclusions,” United States v. Mespoulede, supra, 597 F.2d at 333 (quoting United States v. Jacobson, 547 F.2d 21, 23 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 946 , 97 S.Ct. 1581 , 51 L.Ed.2d 793 (1977)), it has been recognized that “[s]ince it is usually impossible to determine with any precision upon what basis the jury reached a verdict in a criminal case, it is a rare situation in which …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Seijo, 514 F.2d 1357 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1043 , 97 S.Ct. 745 , 50 L.Ed.2d 756 (1977); United States v. Rosner, 516 F.2d 269 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3198 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1203 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stroop
See United States v. Seijo, 514 F.2d 1357 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1043 , 97 S.Ct. 745 , 50 L.Ed.2d 756 (1977); United States v. Rosner, 516 F.2d 269 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 3198 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1203 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. F. W. Standefer
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Seijo, 537 F.2d 694, 697 (2d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1043 , 97 S.Ct. 745 , 50 L.Ed.2d 756 (1977); United States v. Davis, 460 F.2d 792, 796 (4th Cir. 1972); United States v. Smith, 446 F.2d 200, 202-03 (4th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co.
v.
Martin
v.
Martin
No. 76-738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.