green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Thiel
But see United States v. Crowder, 543 F.2d 312, 317-318 (D.C.Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977); State v. Zayas, 3 Conn.App. 289 , 489 A.2d 380, 383 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Fersner v. United States
But see United States v. Crowder, 177 U.S.App.D.C.165, 543 F.2d 312 (1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977) (self-defense instruction properly refused when defendant testified he did not shoot at all and self-defense theory could be derived only by speculation based on fragments of testimony). 3 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thomas McCabe v. Daniel Rattiner
he issue of what constitutes an 'openly fascist' journal is as much a matter of opinion or idea as is the question what constitutes 'fascism' or the 'radical right
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eunice Husband
See United States v. Crowder, 543 F.2d 312, 316-17 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc) (holding the surgical removal of a bullet “reasonable and proper”, under the circumstances of the case), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Stallings
(2×)
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
W.J. Gray, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
See United States v. Woods, 544 F.2d 242, 249 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 430 U.S. 969 and 431 U.S. 954 (1977). 9 Accordingly, we deny Gray's request for the appointment of counsel, his motion for ex parte relief, and affirm the district court's judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
Wachtel v. Storm
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 893 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
See United States v. Woods, 544 F.2d 242, 257 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , and 430 U.S. 969 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Commission
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882 (2d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (calling someone a “fascist” is indefinite and an opinion and therefore protected by the first amendment).
cited
Cited "see"
Van Duyn v. Smith
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 895 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S. Ct. 785 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Extradition of Singh
(2×)
See Peroff v. Hylton, 542 F.2d 1247, 1249 (4 Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977) (executive may deny extradition request but requesting country has primary responsibility for protecting against assassination).
cited
Cited "see"
Katz v. Gladstone
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 888 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Times Mirror Co.
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 895 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (use of expressions such as “fascist” cannot “be regarded as having been proved to be statements of fact ... because of the tremendous imprecision of the meaning and usage of these terms_”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lakian v. Globe Newspaper Co.
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 897 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 (1977). 7 The judge’s words on nominal damages were: “If the plaintiff proves that a defendant is liable for damages, and that he has suffered some actual injury, but you conclude that there is no proof of serious harm to the plaintiff, and that the proven actual injury is so insignificant as not to be susceptible to reasonable translation into dollars, you may award nominal damages.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carroll v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Woods, 544 F.2d 242, 258-62 (6th Cir.1976) (defendant was not arrested on basis of communication), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 , cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969 , 97 S.Ct. 1652 , 52 L.Ed.2d 361 , cert. denied, 431 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 2675 , 53 L.Ed.2d 270 (1977); People v. Ford, 150 Cal. App.3d 687 , 198 Cal. Rptr. 80 (Ct.App. 1984) (no probable cause at time of communication to arresting officer); Commonwealth v. Gambit, 274 Pa.Super. 571 , 418 A.2d 554 (1980) (no probable cause at time of communication to arresting officer), aff'd, 501 Pa. 453 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Schiavone Construction Co. v. Time, Inc.
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 897 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Davis v. Schuchat, 510 F.2d 731, 737-38 (D.C.Cir.1975); Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F.2d 324 (2d Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Perruccio v. Arseneault
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 894 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S. Ct. 785 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry E. Claiborne
(2×)
See United States v. Woods, 544 F.2d 242, 250 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); Beverly v. United States, 468 F.2d 732, 743 (5th Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Marcone, Frank J. v. Penthouse International Magazine For Men
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889 (2d Cir.1976) (libel proof doctrine is narrow), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Sharon v. Time, 575 F.Supp. at 1169 .
cited
Cited "see"
Marcone v. Penthouse International Magazine for Men
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889 (2d Cir.1976) (libel proof doctrine is narrow), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Sharon v. Time, 575 F.Supp. at 1169 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert Novak
(2×)
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 895 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sharon v. Time, Inc.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society Inc., 556 F.2d 113, 121 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1002 , 98 S.Ct. 647 , 54 L.Ed.2d 498 (1977); see Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889-90 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Holt v. Cox Enterprises
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882 (2d Cir.1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 -86, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Marcone v. Penthouse Internatinal, Ltd.
See Buckley v. Littel, 539 F.2d 882, 889 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (Cardillo “libel proof” doctrine is a narrow, limited one).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joint Council of Teamsters, No. 42 v. National Labor Relations Board, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Associated General Contractors of California, Inc., California Dump Truck Owners Association, Intervenors. California Dump Truck Owners Association v. National Labor Relations Board, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Intervenor
(2×)
See La Mirada Trucking, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 166, 538 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marchiondo v. New Mexico State Tribune Co.
See, Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., supra; Myers v. Boston Magazine Co., Inc., supra; Pease v. Telegraph Publishing Co., supra. Accusation of a crime, on the other hand, is not so protected.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joint Council of Teamsters, No. 42 v. National Labor Relations Board, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Associated General Contractors of California, Inc., California Dump Truck Owners Association, Intervenors. California Dump Truck Owners Association v. National Labor Relations Board, Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc., Intervenor
(2×)
See La Mirada Trucking, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 166, 538 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joint Council of Teamsters, No. 42 v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See La Mirada Trucking, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 166, 538 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joint Council of Teamsters, No. 42 v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See La Mirada Trucking, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 166, 538 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Crowder, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 165 , 543 F.2d 312 (1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977); accord, Creamer v. State, 229 Ga. 511 , 192 S.E.2d 350 (1972), cert. dismissed, 410 U.S. 975 , 93 S.Ct. 1454 , 35 L.Ed.2d 709 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank Of Omaha v. The Marquette National Bank Of Minneapolis
See Missouri v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 620 F.2d 1301 (8th Cir. 1980) 5 The Minnesota act was passed in April 1976, yet it was not until the second Fisher case in 1977, Fisher v. First National Bank of Chicago, 538 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977) (Fisher I ); Fisher v. First National Bank of Omaha, 548 F.2d 255 (8th Cir. 1977) (Fisher II ), that the courts fully appreciated the protections of 12 U.S.C. § 85 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gaspar Eugenio Jimenez Escobedo v. United States of America, Gustavo Castillo v. Donald D. Forsht, U. S. Marshal
(2×)
See Peroff v. Hylton, 542 F.2d 1247, 1249 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 [ 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 ] (1977) . . .” Sindona v. Grant, supra, 619 F.2d at 174.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alfred Avins, in No. 79-1747 v. James P. White, in No. 79-1748
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 893 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (use of “fascist,” “fellow traveler” and “radical right” as political labels cannot be regarded as statements of fact).
discussed
Cited "see"
Myers v. Boston Magazine Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 893 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 (1977); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 566, Comment c (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chau v. Lewis
See e.g., Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 893-94 (2d Cir.1976) (terms such as “fascist,” “fellow traveller of fascism” and “radical right” held to be “tremendously imprecise[ ]” and “so debatable, loose and varying, that they are insusceptible to proof of truth or falsity”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 786, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Weiner v. Doubleday & Co., Inc., 142 A.D.2d 100, 105 , 535 N.Y.S.2d 597, 600 (1st Dep’t 1988) (the phrase “big, fat ugly Jew” was found to be a “mere epithet” and non-actionable) aff'd, 74 NY.2d 586, 550 NY.S.2d 251, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jewell v. NYP Holdings, Inc.
See, e.g., Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 893-94 (2d Cir.1976) (language such as “fascist,” “fellow traveller of fascism” and “radical right” held to be “tremendous[ly] imprecise! ]” and “so debatable, loose and varying, that they are insusceptible to proof of truth or falsity”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Corporate Training Unlimited, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Go., 981 F.Supp. 112, 123 (E.D.N.Y.1997) (holding that the title to a television broadcast, “Rambo Goes to Reykjavik”, was “the type of hyperbolic speech which ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cerasani v. Sony Corp.
At the same time, the Second Circuit has cautioned that “[t]he libel-proof plaintiff doctrine is to be applied with caution, since few plaintiffs will have so bad a reputation that they are not entitled to obtain redress for defamatory statements____” Guccione, 800 F.2d at 303 ; see also Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889 (2d Cir.1976) (confining the “limited, narrow” libel-proof doctrine to the “basic factual context” of the Cardillo case that first enunciated this defense), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977); Sharon v. Time, *353 Inc., 575 F.Su…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F.2d 712, 722-723 (5th Cir.) (Bell, J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 127 (1972) and Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889-90 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 786, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (expressing view that clear and convincing standard applies to issue of falsity) with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F.2d 324, 341 (2d Cir.1969), ce rt. denied 396 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct. 701 , 24 L.Ed.2d 695 (1970) and Rattray v. City of National City, 36 F.3d 1480, 1487 (9th Cir.1994) (expressing view that…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ward v. Zelikovsky
(2×)
Ibid.; see also Buckley v. Littell, 539 F. 2d 882 (2d Cir.1976) (holding that the terms "fascist," "fellow traveler," and "radical right" directed against William F. Buckley, Jr., although strong and hate-filled, constituted expressions on matters of opinion, such as what constitutes a "fascist," and therefore did not necessarily imply defamatory facts), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 -86, 50 L.Ed. 2d 777 (1977); Rutherford v. Dougherty, 91 F. 2d 707 (3d Cir.1937) (holding that clergyman's accusation in letter to department store that operated radio station that radio broadcaster f…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunter v. Greenwood Trust Co.
See, e.g., Fisher v. First Nat'l Bank, 538 F. 2d 1284, 1289-90 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota)
See, e.g., Fisher v. First Nat'l Bank, 538 F. 2d 1284, 1289-90 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 778 (1977). *441 In 1936, the Comptroller of the Currency issued an interpretation of section 85 which administratively recognized the "most favored lender" doctrine as part of federal banking law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Koskotas v. James B. Roche, Etc.
(2×)
Similarly, “the degree of risk to [the relator’s] life from extradition is an issue that properly falls within the exclusive purview of the executive branch.” Ahmad, 910 F.2d at 1066 (quoting Sindona, 619 F.2d at 174 ) (emphasis added); see also Peroff v. Hylton, 542 F.2d 1247, 1249 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 787 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Immuno AG v. Moor-Jankowski
(See, supra, at 981; see also, Buckley v Littell, 539 F2d 882, 895, cert denied 429 US 1062 .) As for Moor-Jankowski’s other comments in the New Scientist article, namely, that Immuno’s attempt to circumvent treaty restriction would reflect poorly on other researchers and that the World Health Organization would soon find it necessary to take a position on the Immuno project, these too were readily identifiable statements of opinion.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schiavone Construction Co. And Ronald A. Schiavone, Individually, in 86-5839 v. Time, Inc., in 86-5920
See, e.g., Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 897 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 786, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1976); Davis v. Schuchat, 510 F.2d 731, 737-38 (D.C.Cir.1975). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 20 v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
(2×)
Indeed, it would seem that deference, if any, on the issue of the validity of the Union’s lawsuit should be paid to the district court, in which Congress under LMRA § 301 has vested “primary” jurisdiction of suits for breach of collective bargaining agreements, Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70 v. Celotex Corp., 708 F.2d 488 , 490 n. 3 (9th Cir.1983); see also La Mirada Trucking, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union 166, 538 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir.1976) (district court, not NLRB, has authority to hear suits for breach of collective bargaining agreements), cert. denied,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Compare, for example, the use of “fascist” as a generic epithet, see Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 786, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977), with its use in such a statement as “He was a close companion of Mussolini and a Fascist.” We tend to agree with the district court that if the term “anti-Semitic” has a core, factual meaning, then the truth of the description was proved here. 7 *1298 We rest our decision, however, on the fact that Liberty Lobby has adduced no evidence tending to show the charge of anti-Semitism was made with th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leal v. State
See also Ochs v. State, 543 S.W.2d 355 (Tex.Crim.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); Beasley v. State, 683 S.W.2d 132 (Tex.App. — Eastland 1984, pet. ref’d); Hurwitz v. State, 673 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.App — Austin 1984), aff'd on other grounds, 700 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leal v. State
See also Ochs v. State, 543 S.W.2d 355 (Tex.Crim.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 786 , 50 L.Ed.2d 778 (1977); Beasley v. State, 683 S.W.2d 132 (Tex.App.Eastland 1984, pet. ref'd); Hurwitz v. State, 673 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.App.Austin 1984), aff'd on other grounds, 700 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.Crim.App. 1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hurt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-771.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1977.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.